AI Rate Professor

English

Trudi Mullerworth

ENG300 · ENGWR3OO · ENGWR302 · ENGWR300 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
52.38%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Trudi Mullerworth can work for organized students, but recent online and writing-course reviews make her a risky choice.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy readingMixed gradingHelpful when engagedUnclear online directionsExtra credit
  • Student opinion is split between older positive reviews and , and unclear directions.
  • The - and writing-heavy, especially online.
  • Students who stay organized and ask for help can do well, but recent reviews warn that support and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Good grades are common when students keep up, but workload, strict zeros, AI disputes, and .

In person evidence sounds easier and more supportive, while online evidence is more divided and recently more punitive.

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

The writing concepts are manageable, but the reading, papers, quizzes, and .

Online classes feel more self-directed and heavy, while in person classes are described as clearer and more guided in older reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Reviews suggest participation and keeping up matter, but they do not clearly prove a .

In person reviews mention participation more often, while and Canvas work.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Recommendations are split because supportive and easy experiences are balanced , and .

In person reviews are more favorable overall, while online reviews are sharply mixed and more negative in recent years.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

49/100

Some students call her easy and accommodating, but , and AI-related grade disputes.

Format shift

In as fair or easy, while recent online reviews describe harsher and .

Workload

Heavy

33/100

Students frequently mention lots of reading, papers, discussions, quizzes, and weekly activities.

Format shift

Online workload is the clearest concern, while in person workload is often described as reasonable in older reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

She is praised as caring and helpful in many older reviews, but and condescending communication.

Format shift

In person teaching is generally rated better, while online teaching , and response quality.

Assessment method

Balanced

57/100

Assessment includes , and participation rather than only exams or only assignments.

Format shift

Online sections emphasize Canvas discussions, papers, and quizzes, while in , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person reviews are more positive overall, especially older ones, with praise for , and reasonable assignments.

Main concern

Recent in person reviews are much more negative than older ones and and Canvas use.

What students said

“ and is not overly critical.”
ENGWR300
“She gives easy instructions and cares about her students.”
ENGWR300
“She uses AI to grade the students work.”
ENGWR300

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are highly mixed, ranging from easy and , and frustrating with .

Main concern

Online students may , and inconsistent feedback or grading.

What students said

“workload could get pretty heavy at times although still manageable.”
ENGWR302
“ ”
ENGWR300
“She was super accommodating and .”
ENGWR302

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and tests but do not clearly prove unusually strict proctoring, open-book rules, or webcam requirements.

QuizzesTestsMajor PapersReading Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In , and , but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring requirements.

Friday QuizzesTestsEssaysExtra Credit
“ , and more.”
ENGWR300
“We had 3 books, 3 tests and 5 essays throughout the semester.”
ENGWR300

Online

, and weekly activities, but do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or .

Weekly QuizzesMajor PapersCanvas Discussions
“There 3 major papers, discussions, reader responses, and a .”
ENGWR300
“There are at least 5 activities in a week, with quizzes and major papers.”
ENGWR302

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not bad, but workload could get pretty heavy at times although still manageable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She's very sweet and is willing to help you if you ask.”

⚖️

49/100

“ no pts”

📚 Workload Pressure

33/100

“There are at least 5 activities in a week, with quizzes and major papers.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and is not overly critical.
  • She is condescending and .
  • Really good about getting back

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & AI

  • She uses AI to grade the students work.
  • will not look at why you were flagged for AI
  • she let me redo it twice.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Overall, she was an okay professor. There 3 major papers, discussions, reader responses, and a .
  • The
  • The .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 21 reviews with both formats represented, though recent reviews are more negative than the older review base.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 55
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENGWR30013 reviews
ENGWR3024 reviews
ENG3002 reviews
ENGWR3OO2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 3