AI Rate Professor

Writing

Matthew Harding

ENGWR58 · ENGL1A · ENGWR51 · ENGWR101 · ENGR300 · ENG301 · ENGWR301 · ENGW51 · ENGWR300 · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
77.78%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take Harding if you want meaningful writing growth and , but if you need a simple, highly structured English class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGreat FeedbackChallenging WriterCaring MentorHeavy ReadingSometimes Disorganized
  • , and ability to develop better writers.
  • The course is not a breezy English class, with , and .
  • He is more rewarding for students who want to improve than for students seeking a low-effort requirement.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

Good grades are realistic because and revision chances, but students must keep up with , and unclear structure.

In person evidence shows more revision support, while online evidence is less forgiving and more workload-heavy.

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

The writing concepts, readings, and professor is supportive.

Online sections sound harder to self-manage, while in person sections are challenging but and feedback.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

52/100

Attendance and participation help a lot, and some reviews imply skipping or falling behind makes the class much harder.

In person evidence stresses participation and attending class, while but strict need to stay on track.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

, and growth, but because of workload, grading, and disorganization.

In person recommendations are stronger than online recommendations, which are more divided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

He can be tough on writing, but , and support make grading feel fair to many students.

Format shift

In person reviews mention rewrites and second chances more often, while .

Workload

Moderate

43/100

Workload is moderate to heavy because of reading, essays, revisions, and occasional dense assignment bursts.

Format shift

Online workload is the biggest complaint, while in person workload is demanding but more evenly supported.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students describe him as funny, caring, passionate, and strong with feedback, though sometimes scattered or unclear.

Format shift

In person teaching is rated more warmly, while online teaching suffers from structure and connection issues.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Grades , and participation rather than tests.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize writing assignments, with in person reviews explicitly noting few or no tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person reviews are mostly positive, emphasizing feedback, humor, revisions, support, and .

Main concern

The main concern is that , and .

What students said

“He gave me upto 5 !”
ENGWR300
“Although the to understand”
ENGWR300
“He was good education wise but a .”
ENGWR300

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, praising feedback and passion but , and weak structure.

Main concern

Online students may struggle with organization, pacing, and .

What students said

“just lots of and material and lectures.”
ENGWR300
“He threw about 12 assignments the first week.”
ENGWR300
“ and confusing.”
ENGWR301

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because reviews mainly describe essays and writing work, with .

No Tests Or Quizzes In SummerFew Or No TestsEssay-Based AssessmentRevision Opportunities

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews explicitly support few or no tests in some sections and emphasize papers, essays, and revisions over exams.

No Tests Or Quizzes In SummerFew TestsEssay Revisions
“ .”
ENGWR300
“Tests? Not many”
ENGR300
“if you do not like your grade for an .”
ENGL1A

Online

Online reviews mention essays and reading work but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, midterm format, or .

Essay-Based Assessment
“ .”
ENGWR300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He will challenge you, make you think and make you a stronger writer.”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“His devotion and passion made writing attractive!”

📝

82/100

“ , and for the most .”

📚 Workload Reality

43/100

“The !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He talks a lot and wants you to catch what he wants in his essays.
  • His lectures helps you think more critically and encourages group discussions in class.
  • He is always willing to work with you so long as you are doing the work.

Theme 2

✍️ About Writing Growth

  • You will leave the class a more confident writer
  • and lets you revise them to get a better grade.
  • He will walk you through all the difficulties.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Difficulty & Structure

  • This is definitely not your regular English class.
  • He is most of the but he makes sure to give enough time and the right equipment for you to do your work.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

89/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 31 reviews span many years with detailed comments and a consistent pattern of strong teaching but demanding writing work.

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 57
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGWR30017 reviews
ENGWR1015 reviews
ENGWR3013 reviews
ENG3011 review
ENGL1A1 review
Show 4 more courses
ENGR3001 review
ENGW511 review
ENGWR511 review
ENGWR581 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 2 · A 9 · A- 1

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 5