AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Nicholas Chow

MATH144 · STAT300 · MATH120 · MATH343 · MATH125 · MATH100 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
64.29%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a and can handle slow, detailed lectures.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringClear gradingHelpfulLong lecturesLenient grader
  • Most recent reviews describe him as caring, patient, and very helpful.
  • STAT300 students often say exams are manageable when they attend and follow class work.
  • Older math , and heavier homework.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

An A looks very reachable in recent STAT300 reviews because class work, attendance, and .

The easy-A evidence is strongest in in-person STAT300 reviews, while the one online review is positive but less grade-specific.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Recent students say he breaks math down clearly, though long lectures and harder upper-level math keep it from being effortless.

, while in-person evidence ranges from very easy STAT300 to difficult older math courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

because missing class can mean missing major content, but reviews do not show strict penalties.

In-person reviews emphasize attendance more; the online review .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

, and fair support, despite complaints about slow lectures.

Both formats are positive, but the online recommendation rests on only one review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students repeatedly say , and fair chances to earn points.

Format shift

Lenient grading evidence .

Workload

Light

75/100

Recent STAT300 reviews describe optional homework and mostly in-class assignments, though older math courses had lots of homework.

Format shift

Online mentions lots of , while recent in-person STAT300 reviews describe very little outside work.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

He is consistently described as caring, patient, and as the main weakness.

Format shift

The online review praises clear step-by-step teaching, while and older criticism.

Assessment method

Balanced

56/100

, and finals, with exams important but not the only factor.

Format shift

; the online review does not clearly describe exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, especially for STAT300, with praise for care, help, and .

Main concern

Some older , and .

What students said

“He wants the and he's very involved with his students.”
STAT300
“ turn anything in for that.”
STAT300
“ .”
MATH120

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review is very positive and .

Main concern

Only one online review limits confidence.

What students said

“goes over the material very well and shows problems step by step”
MATH144

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually described as manageable or study-guide based, but one upper-level course had a .

Study Guide Based ExamsManageable ExamsFinal Weight Can Matter

Assessment risk

Standard

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

based on study guides, but one course had a 24% final.

Study Guide Based ExamsEasy ExamsHigh-Stakes Final In One Course
“ ”
STAT300
“the ”
STAT300
“with your final being 24% of ur grade”
MATH343

Online

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you attend class and do your part in paying attention and asking questions, you can pass easily with an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“He does a great job going into detail to make sure his students fully grasp topics.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

82/100

“ take this course.”

⚖️

82/100

“he's a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's such a great professor!
  • He does ramble a little bit, but .
  • his lectures can be dreadingly slow

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • turn anything in for that.
  • and he makes math look easy.
  • you will still have to work for

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • he always sent that day's work if I asked & was always willing to help me.
  • He wants the and he's very involved with his students.
  • he is always willing to assist.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews across many years show a clear split between strong recent STAT300 praise and older complaints.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

STAT3006 reviews
MATH3433 reviews
MATH1002 reviews
MATH1201 review
MATH1251 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH1441 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1