AI Rate Professor

Management

Cory Thomas

CMT134 · CMT310 · CONSTPLANS · CMT112 · CMT120 · CMT112CMT136 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
11/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
26.32%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless required, especially if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized CanvasHeavy workloadBook-based teachingUnclear helpStrict late work
  • Most reviews describe poor communication, disorganization, and little direct teaching.
  • Workload is consistently heavy, , and exams.
  • Some students still earn high grades, but many say the class feels frustrating and unsupported.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

Many students earn As, but the grade , and self-teaching.

Online reviews include some easy-grade comments, while and heavy workload.

Is the course easy?

Standard

43/100

The material is not always conceptually hard, but and .

Online and and workload more than the subject itself.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Participation and discussion work matter, but reviews do not consistently prove a .

Online reviews emphasize weekly participation work, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

because they feel unsupported, overloaded, and confused.

Both formats are mostly negative, with online reviews slightly more likely to mention easy grades despite poor experience.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Grades can be achievable, but students cite no late work, unforgiving standards, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention no late work and grade challenges, while and .

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Reviews repeatedly mention heavy , and long projects.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy workload, with online reviews and quizzes.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Most comments describe disorganization, poor communication, little teaching, and dismissive or humiliating interactions.

Format shift

Online reviews stress self-teaching and lack of help, while and Canvas disorganization.

Assessment method

Balanced

63/100

The class , and projects rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews give clearer evidence of weekly quizzes, exams, discussion posts, and papers; and readings.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are also mostly , and harsh classroom tone.

Main concern

and dismissive responses to questions.

What students said

“ and is a complete eye-sore.”
CMT310
“ .”
CMT120
“Very hard to communicate with.”
CONSTPLANS

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews often describe book-based , and weak instructor support.

Main concern

Students report lots of work and .

What students said

“Everything comes from the book”
CMT310
“There is and confusing.”
CMT310
“If you want to waste your time and money and .”
CMT112

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention frequent quizzes and exams from the book, but do .

Chapter QuizzesFrequent ExamsBook-Based Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

46/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and specific textbook testing, but do not clearly prove exam format or .

Test HeavyTextbook-Based Tests
“you will be tested on a specific quote”
CMT310
“Just do the and exams”
CMT112

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes every chapter or module and exams every few weeks, but .

Chapter QuizzesFrequent ExamsBook-Based Tests
“ . every three weeks is a exam.”
CMT112
“Exams and ”
CMT120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There is and confusing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“And she didnt teach anything, all was from book.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

24/100

“ . Proceed with caution.”

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“assigns a borderline obscene amount of discussion posts and readings.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Everything comes from the book
  • Barely learned anything.
  • when you

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • There are tons of
  • we also had to write three 1500-words essays.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication

  • The most disappointing part of the class was the lack of help when you have a question regarding an assignment.
  • Very hard to communicate with.
  • She WILL look down on you for asking questions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-one reviews across online and a few positive outliers.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 513

Course coverage

CMT31011 reviews
CMT1124 reviews
CMT1202 reviews
CONSTPLANS2 reviews
CMT112CMT1361 review
Show 1 more courses
CMT1341 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 2