AI Rate Professor

English

Rachel Fields

ENG300 · ENGL0501 · ENGWR102 · ENGWR300 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

if you want a low-workload writing class and can tolerate possible off-topic lectures and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy workloadLenient essay gradingEngaging but off-topicMixed professionalismAttendance matters
  • Most older reviews describe an easy, fun writing class with few assignments and .
  • Recent reviews are , and unprofessional behavior.
  • The grade experience depends heavily on whether the older lenient pattern or the recent stricter pattern reflects the current course.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Older reviews repeatedly say the course , and essay revisions, but recent low grades and tough-grader complaints prevent a higher score.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The writing workload is usually described as simple and light, though recent reviews say the teaching is unfocused rather than intellectually hard.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

because roll and absences can affect grades, even though the class itself is often described as laid back.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

, but the newest reviews are severe enough to make the recommendation risky.

The recommendation evidence is entirely in person and is split between older praise and recent warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Older students describe easy grading and unlimited essay fixes, but recent students report poor and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

Most reviews describe only a , and no tests or quizzes.

Format shift

The .

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

Teaching is highly inconsistent, with older praise for passion and learning offset by recent complaints about irrelevant lectures and poor instruction.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in person, with recent reviews much more negative than older ones.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Assessment appears dominated by essays and presentations rather than exams.

Format shift

, and no online assessment evidence exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are polarized, with many older students calling the class easy and fun while recent students report weak teaching and .

Main concern

Recent reviews , and .

What students said

“Easy and fun class. . Only 3 essays.”
ENGWR300
“ and doesn't try to teach how to construct a proper essay.”
ENGWR300

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

exam burden.

No TestsNo QuizzesEssay-Based Assessment

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and only a few essays.

No TestsNo QuizzesOnly Essays
“ . Only 3 essays.”
ENGWR300

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy and fun class. . Only 3 essays.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recent negative shifts. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

54/100

“She talks about cults and not about English.”

📈 Easy A Potential

78/100

“ you as many times as you want to fix them to an A.”

⚖️

58/100

“ and doesn't try to teach how to construct a proper essay.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Made 3 hours fly by like nothing.
  • She just talks about cults and not about English.
  • Fields by far is the greatest teacher I've had at crc.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy and fun class. . Only 3 essays.
  • Very strict with getting work turn in on time, but an .
  • Her class was easy.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Recent Concerns

  • and so many points for irrelevant quizzes.
  • She doesn't teach properly.
  • Very unprofessional.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

There are 19 reviews across many years, but the sharp age gap between older praise and recent criticism lowers confidence.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENGWR30016 reviews
ENG3001 review
ENGL05011 review
ENGWR1021 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values