AI Rate Professor

English

Chantel Perales

ENGWR101 · ENGL1A · ENGWR302 · COMM1 · ENGLISH300 · ENG301 · ENG300 · ENGWR301 · ENGWR300 · 67 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
40.74%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take her if you want writing improvement and , but if you need an easy A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough Essay GraderLots of WritingClear ExpectationsMonotone LecturesImproves Writing
  • Students and expects serious writing effort.
  • Many reviews say the class improves writing skills if students keep up and .
  • Negative reviews focus on unclear , and a workload that can feel excessive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Passing with a B or A is possible, but students repeatedly say strong essays, steady writing, and .

Online reviews include some manageable A experiences, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

The material is not conceptually extreme, but the reading, essays, journals, and .

Online sections can feel compressed and reading-heavy, while , and ongoing assignments.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as formally mandatory, but participation, quizzes, lectures, and in-class writing make showing up important.

and assignment deadlines, while in-person evidence includes participation, quizzes, and lecture-based expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Students recommend her when they value writing improvement, but many warn against her because of and dry or .

Online recommendations are mixed but slightly structured, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

The dominant , and limited .

Format shift

Both formats support strict grading, with online reviews especially noting hard essay scores and .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students describe , and small writing tasks.

Format shift

Online workload can be intense in short terms, while , and reading.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

She is often seen as knowledgeable and useful for writing growth, but monotone delivery, , and accessibility issues lower the experience.

Format shift

Online reviews mention responsiveness and structure, while instruction and boring or unclear lectures.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades appear driven , and writing assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Online and and writing tasks, with only some in-person comments mentioning quizzes or in-class essays.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly mixed, with praise for writing growth and fairness but , and many papers.

Main concern

The main and sometimes unclear or limited feedback.

What students said

“She is a , but .”
ENGWR300
“Get ready to write a lot, for ”
ENGWR302

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews describe a reading- and writing-heavy course with , but some students found the structure manageable with time management.

Main concern

The main and frequent writing work, especially in short summer sections.

What students said

“There was a LOT of reading, and 3 papers in 8 weeks is not a joke”
ENGWR302
“Mostly journals and !”
ENGWR301

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly writing-based, and reviews do not clearly prove strict proctoring, open-book exams, or Lockdown Browser use.

EssaysQuizzesIn-Class Essays

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and in-class essays, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

QuizzesMidtermFinalIn-Class Essays
“She assigns 5 essays which are pretty decent. She gives you a list of topics to write about. 1 midterm and 2-3 quizzes.”
ENGWR300
“A and .”
ENGWR300

Online

Online reviews mention or quizzes in one section and emphasize essays and writing prompts, but they do not clearly prove exam proctoring, webcam, open-book, or .

EssaysWriting Prompts
“There were or .”
ENGWR301
“ and will make a significant change in your grade.”
ENG300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It's not an easy A, but it's a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and writing improvement. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“You also learn a lot from her especially writing skills.”

⚖️

28/100

“She is a , but .”

📚 Workload Load

30/100

“ book.”

Theme 1

✍️ About Writing Growth

  • I learned a lot from her ENGWR 300 class.
  • She has definitely improved my writing skills.
  • if you if you want to slack off.

Theme 2

⚖️ About Grades

  • Getting an A but a high B is likely.
  • .
  • She grades really really hard.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Be prepared to do a LOT of writing.
  • There was a LOT of reading, and 3 papers in 8 weeks is not a joke
  • Six essays in her class... super doable and she is very reasonable.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

67

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews spanning many years, with , and teaching style.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 521
3 out of 56
2 out of 58
1 out of 511

Course coverage

ENGWR30019 reviews
ENG3009 reviews
ENGWR3028 reviews
ENGWR1014 reviews
3003 reviews
Show 5 more courses
COMM12 reviews
ENG3012 reviews
ENGL1A1 review
ENGLISH3001 review
ENGWR3011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 4 · A- 2

B range

14

B+ 2 · B 10 · B- 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Audit/No Grade 2 · Not sure yet 4