AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Mike Pelletti

Courses not reported · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you are comfortable defending your work live and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardAI SuspicionSpecific AnswersWeekly WorkZoom FinalGood Feedback
  • The but strict expectations for specific answers.
  • Students and answer questions well.
  • The final exam is held on Zoom, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

, but the B+ outcome and specific answer demands keep an A from looking effortless.

All evidence comes from one Online review.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The work sounds manageable, but , and thesis questioning add structure and pressure.

All evidence comes from one Online review.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Students need to attend Zoom calls for thesis paper discussion and are graded on their responses.

Only the Online review mentions required Zoom participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

The review is mixed to negative because AI suspicion and .

All recommendation evidence comes from one Online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

The review labels him a and says he expects very specific answers.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

, but , and thesis discussion create steady work.

Format shift

This workload evidence comes only from the Online review.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

The but focuses more on suspicion, strict specificity, and Zoom questioning.

Format shift

Teaching evidence comes only from the Online review.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears to mix homework, weekly quizzes, module participation, thesis discussion, and a .

Format shift

This assessment evidence comes only from the Online review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online course has easy homework but , and a Zoom final.

Main concern

The main concern is being and AI use.

What students said

“ but he wants such specific answers.”
13946
“The as well.”
13946

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The , but the review does not clearly prove webcam rules, open-book status, or proctoring software.

Zoom FinalThesis Discussion QuestionsPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The Online review says the and students discuss thesis papers on Zoom, but it .

Zoom FinalZoom Thesis DiscussionPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“Students need to attend zoom calls to discuss their thesis papers and he grades you .”
13946
“The as well.”
13946

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ but he wants such specific answers.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in , and ; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“ ”

⚖️

30/100

“ but he wants such specific answers.”

🧪

45/100

“The as well.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This professor is suspecting of all students using AI.
  • Students need to attend zoom calls to discuss their thesis papers and he grades you .

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • but he wants such specific answers.
  • Module comments, module forum, and quizzes weekly as an eight week course.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so the evidence is specific but too limited for strong confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

139461 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values