AI Rate Professor

History

Andres Tapia

HIST311 · HIST310 · HIST373 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
87/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
87.5%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you like history and and writing for a fair reward.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerGreat LecturesReading HeavyClear CriteriaWriting HeavyHelpful
  • Students consistently describe him as knowledgeable, helpful, and .
  • The course often requires heavy reading and writing, but and doable.
  • Most students earn strong grades when they keep up with papers, discussions, quizzes, and exams.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

A grades are common when students complete the reading, writing, discussions, and , but it is not a free A.

Online evidence says time can be scheduled well, while and exam load.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The concepts are approachable for history students, but , and exams make the course academically real.

Online sounds manageable and enjoyable, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation and discussions matter, but the reviews do not prove a .

Online evidence mentions discussion boards, while in-person evidence mentions participation and class .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students recommend him because , and gives students the resources to succeed.

Both formats are positive, with stronger confidence from the larger In person review set.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Many students earned A grades and say the work is straightforward if they use his resources and .

Format shift

Online evidence supports manageable grading, while and strong grade outcomes.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The class is doable but often , and finals.

Format shift

Online workload is scheduled reading and discussion, while .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Students praise his lectures, knowledge, accessibility, feedback, and and due-date issues.

Format shift

Online evidence is positive but limited, while organization concerns.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and participation rather than one dominant method.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize discussions, quizzes, and papers, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

lectures and fair grading but substantial writing, reading, and exams.

Main concern

The main concern is the time required for essays, readings, and .

What students said

“ and knowledgeable and the lectures and discussions in class are good.”
HIST-310
“ !”
HIST373

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The online review describes an enjoyable, reading-based class with manageable scheduling and discussion boards.

Main concern

The main concern is keeping up with reading and discussion work.

What students said

“Absolutely enjoyed my class.”
HIST311
“It was easy to schedule out my time to read, do the work and be able to enjoy my learning.”
HIST311

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are mostly standard history assessments with essays, concept IDs, midterms, and finals, but .

MidtermsFinalEssay QuestionsNon-Cumulative ExamsPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and essay questions, but does not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring requirements.

MidtermsFinalEssay QuestionsNon-Cumulative Exams
“The heavier exams consisted of identifying 5 concepts as a paragraph each, and one essay!”
HIST311
“Grade consists of , and participation.”
HIST311

Online

The Online review does not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He gives you everything you need to succeed in class and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessment style; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“ and knowledgeable and the lectures and discussions in class are good.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Reality

48/100

“it's doable, but make sure you know this class takes a lot of your time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Prof.Tapia is a Great teacher, but !
  • Awesome history teacher.
  • You can tell he likes teaching about Mexican history.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just do your work to the and you will be fine.
  • Honestly if you use the resources he provides, then you'll get a good grade!
  • The .

Theme 3

📝

  • For in person class, you are only graded by 3 papers, 2 exams and a .
  • A lot of discussion boards and a few papers. Just be ready to write.
  • Grade consists of , and participation.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews across several years are detailed and mostly consistent, with strong grade and recommendation evidence.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HIST3115 reviews
HIST3732 reviews
HIST-3101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 6 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values