AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Glenn Pico

MTH100 · MATH101 · MATH400 · MATH420 · MATH30 · MATH102 · MATH120 · MATH370 · LINEAR · ALGEB30 · MATH401 · MATH355 · MATH100 · 128 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you can handle a strict, inconsistent classroom experience and are comfortable teaching yourself when needed.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing teaching styleHeavy homeworkExtra credit helpsRude to some studentsClear for self-motivated students
  • Reviews are sharply split between and students who describe him as rude or confusing.
  • Recent online reviews suggest easy credit with , but and often negative.
  • , and many students say the class requires independence and persistence.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

and easy participation can make high grades possible, but and inconsistent teaching keep it from being effortless.

Online reviews strongly support easy A potential, while and often tie grades to heavy work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The math itself is often manageable for prepared students, but , and unclear help make the experience harder.

Online reviews describe the course as not too difficult, while , and self-teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

because many students say class examples, reviews, and paying attention are needed to do well.

Online reviews , while in-person reviews repeatedly advise going to class and paying attention.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendation depends heavily on whether students connect with his strict style and can learn independently.

Online reviews are grade-friendly but lukewarm on teaching, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and dropped tests help some students, but and tough grading complaints reduce leniency.

Format shift

Online reviews mention grade boosts from , while and harsh grading complaints.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Many students describe tons of , and large weekly problem sets.

Format shift

Online workload seems manageable, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Some students praise clear lectures, but many describe him as .

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is limited and mixed, while and highly polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Reviews mention homework, quizzes, tests, exams, discussion posts, group projects, and .

Format shift

Online assessment includes posts, homework, tests, and projects, while , and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

clear lectures to harsh complaints about rudeness, speed, and confusing instruction.

Main concern

Many students report rude , and poor help with questions.

What students said

“He is the ”
MATH400
“He assigned 150+ homework problems in a week and graded 4, at random.”
MATH120
“He is a horrible teacher! RUN!!!!!”
MATH120

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews are more favorable for grades than teaching, with , and reusable recorded lectures.

Main concern

and lecture value are weak.

What students said

“Easy credits with minimal effort.”
MATH355
“Got through fine watching .”
MATH355
“ .”
MATH401

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence suggests standard math testing with mixed difficulty, but reviews .

Math TestsExamsQuizzesExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and review sessions, but do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

In-Person ExamsQuizzesHard TestsReview Before Exams
“lots of practice problems to prepare for exams.”
LINEAR
“ .”
MATH120
“He so you will do well.”
MATH400

Online

Online reviews mention homework and math tests but do not clearly prove proctoring, .

Math TestsExtra Credit
“I did fine on the homework and math tests”
MATH355

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not for everyone, but he's not the nightmare everyone makes him out to be”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“Pico's lectures and the class notes are actually way more thorough and in depth than the textbook”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“He assigned 150+ homework problems in a week and graded 4, at random.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

48/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is very clear and detailed in his instruction and .
  • Moves very fast in class, stands in front of the board when writing notes and doesn't read while he is writing.
  • as he goes.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy credits with minimal effort.
  • Expect tons of HW, alot of Extra criedit, easy A
  • The class is simple as long as you go and do the homework.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Experience

  • Serious mood swings. He yells at us at random.
  • He is one of the rudest professors I have ever met.
  • Pico is pretty cool. He seems like a drill Sergent in the beginning but when he starts teaching you can really sense that he cares about you and your grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

128

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews cover many years and courses, though .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 514
3 out of 58
2 out of 528
1 out of 556

Course coverage

MATH10014 reviews
MATH1027 reviews
MATH1206 reviews
MATH4005 reviews
MATH1014 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MATH303 reviews
MATH4013 reviews
MATH3552 reviews
MATH3702 reviews
ALGEB301 review
LINEAR1 review
MATH4201 review
MTH1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 4 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values