AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

T Truong

MATH300 · MATH101 · MATH102 · MATH120 · MATH125 · MATH100 · STATS300 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the material well and can learn mostly on your own.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to understandPoor communicationTest heavyTough graderOccasionally lenient policies
  • Most students complain that lectures are hard to understand and .
  • Recent reviews are especially negative and describe the class as very hard to pass.
  • A and manageable homework, but these do not outweigh the teaching concerns.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Some older grading policies helped, but recent and repeated comments , and failure risk.

There are no online reviews, so all evidence comes from in-person comments.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course feels difficult because students report , and poor communication.

There are no online reviews, so all evidence comes from in-person comments.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

because one review but does not enforce it, while most reviews do not address it.

There are no online reviews, so all evidence comes from in-person comments.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students do not recommend him because they , and help insufficient.

There are no online reviews, so all recommendation evidence comes from in-person comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

31/100

Recent reviews call him a and test heavy, though a few older reviews mention open-note tests or .

Format shift

There are no online reviews, so .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

as heavy, but tests and lecture demands make the course feel burdensome.

Format shift

There are no online reviews, so all workload evidence comes from in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Awful

24/100

Students repeatedly report poor communication, unclear lectures, skipped steps, and difficulty getting useful answers.

Format shift

There are no online reviews, so all teaching evidence comes from in-person comments.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews emphasize tests, finals, test heaviness, and .

Format shift

There are no online reviews, so all assessment evidence comes from in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, centered , and limited help.

Main concern

Students frequently say they cannot understand him and .

What students said

“Will make it impossible for you to pass.”
STATS300
“He was very friendly but I couldn't understand a word he was saying.”
MATH102
“there was no way to fail this class with minimal effort.”
MATH300

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed, with some student-friendly older policies but many complaints about hard or .

Test HeavyOpen Notes Open BookTake-Home TestHard Tests

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention , and one take-home test, but do not clearly prove proctoring rules.

Test HeavyOpen Notes Open BookTake-Home TestHard Tests
“ ”
STATS300
“we used the .”
MATH300
“ but that doesnt mean its an easy class...”
MATH100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is very difficult to understand. but that doesnt mean its an easy class...”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 , and exam evidence. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“He was very friendly but I couldn't understand a word he was saying.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

25/100

“ !”

📝

48/100

“One was a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I couldn't understand a word he was saying.
  • and be helpful, I just couldn't follow along
  • He likes to skip steps when doing examples on the board.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • All I gotta say is if .
  • Will make it impossible for you to pass.
  • He is very EASY but he is not a good teacher.

Theme 3

🧪 About Tests

  • but that doesnt mean its an easy class...
  • One was a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 16 reviews span many years and recent reviews strongly reinforce older complaints about communication and difficulty.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 58

Course coverage

MATH1024 reviews
STATS3004 reviews
MATH1002 reviews
MATH1202 reviews
MATH1252 reviews
Show 2 more courses
MATH1011 review
MATH3001 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Rather not say 2