AI Rate Professor

English

Priscilla Hansen

ENGRW300 · ENGWR21396 · ENGLT310 · ENGWR302 · ENGLISH300 · ENG302 · ENG301 · ENG300 · ENGWR301 · LIT310 · ENGLISH · ENGLISH302 · ENGLISH320 · ENGRW302 · ENGLIT310 · ENGWR300 · 129 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
72.73%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want a low-pressure English class, but if you need strong structure or rigorous writing instruction.

Best fit · Easy A HunterVery easy ACaring and kindDisorganizedLight gradingLimited structure
  • Students repeatedly describe her classes as very easy to pass with .
  • Her kindness and ask for help.
  • The main , and limited structure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

95/100

Most students say an A is easy because , and effort matters more than polish.

, but online evidence also includes one severe communication complaint.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

The course content is usually described as , and discussion rather than intellectually demanding work.

, while the online reviews are too limited and mixed to change the overall pattern.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

because class work and deadline changes happen in person, but reviews do not show a .

In-person comments stress showing up for class work and updates, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and easy grades, but several warn against taking her for serious learning or organization.

In-person recommendations are generally positive but qualified, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

Students repeatedly say she gives high scores for completed work and grades lightly.

Format shift

evidence from in-person reviews.

Workload

Light

82/100

Most work is short writing, reading, quizzes, or in-class activity, though some courses include several essays.

Format shift

In-person workload is usually light, while the online ENG301 .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

She is caring and helpful, but , and clarity are recurring weaknesses.

Format shift

In-person teaching is seen as warm but disorganized, while online evidence shows more risk from poor communication.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades appear , and class work rather than major exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize writing assignments, with and occasional exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

professor whose classes are easy but often disorganized.

Main concern

Students may not learn much if and rigorous writing instruction.

What students said

“Take this class if you want an easy A.”
ENG300
“If you want to actually learn, find someone else.”
ENGWR301
“You literally just have to show up and try.”
ENG300

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and one highly frustrated review about poor communication and surprise essay deadlines.

Main concern

Online organization and due-date communication can be stressful.

What students said

“An easy A class if you show up and do the minimal work.”
ENG300
“Zero communication. Zero warning as to when she would post due dates.”
ENG301

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and a final in some sections, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Quizzes MentionedMidterm MentionedFinal MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final in some courses, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Quizzes MentionedMidterm MentionedFinal Mentioned
“You have a total of 4 essays, quizzes on In Cold Blood, and a mid term and final.”
ENGWR302
“There is and final.”
ENGWR302

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want an . If you want to actually learn, find someone else.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“ .”

📈 Easy A Pattern

95/100

“You literally just have to show up and try.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

45/100

“Zero communication. Zero warning as to when she would post due dates.”

Theme 1

📈 About Grades

  • Take this class if you want an easy A.
  • She'll usually give 100s without even looking.
  • Easy A if you work hard!

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • , but and forgetful.
  • She struggles with , and was terrible at keeping students informed.

Theme 3

🧭 About Workload

  • Most of .
  • We read a and a 3 papers to write.
  • groups.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

129

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years give consistent , and disorganization.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 582
4 out of 523
3 out of 511
2 out of 59
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENGWR30210 reviews
ENGWR3018 reviews
ENG3007 reviews
ENGWR3005 reviews
ENG3013 reviews
Show 11 more courses
ENGLISH3023 reviews
ENGLT3103 reviews
ENGLIT3102 reviews
ENGRW3022 reviews
ENG3021 review
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH3001 review
ENGLISH3201 review
ENGRW3001 review
ENGWR213961 review
LIT3101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

27

A+ 7 · A 18 · A- 2

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Pass 1