Kim Harrell

SILA332 · ASL1 · ASL123 · SILA330 · FITKB · SILA315 · SILA305 · DEAF351 · DEAF312 · SILA1 · SILA300 · DEAF310 · SILA316 · SILA302 · L306 · SILA306 · ASL300 · SIGN306 · 58 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 100/100
RMP rating: 4.3/5
Take again: 77.78%
Difficulty: 2.0

The decision

and supportive language class, but serious ASL-track students should weigh the recurring concerns about structure and technical rigor.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyFun and engagingCaringParticipation mattersEasy graderLoose structure

Most students describe Harrell as funny, caring, engaging, and easy to learn from.
Grades are often easy if students attend, participate, and complete a small number of assignments.
The main concerns are inconsistent grading, weak grade posting, loose structure, and doubts about ASL rigor for serious majors.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Grades are usually easy with attendance and participation, but some students report strange or .

The online review reports an easy positive experience, while required and grading can feel inconsistent.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Most students find the class approachable and fun, though missing class or needing deeper ASL structure can make it harder.

Both formats support beginner-friendly learning, but nearly .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Attendance and participation matter because students can fall behind quickly and some reviews warn that skipping hurts performance.

, while the single online review also says participation matters.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend her because , and .

Both formats are positive, but , and advanced preparation.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Many students call her an easy or , but several complain about weird grading, favorites, or missing grade updates.

Format shift

the online review not adding much grading detail.

Workload

Light

80/100

Workload is usually described as few assignments, participation, signs, videos, and occasional written .

Format shift

, while online evidence only confirms collaborative class activity.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students consistently describe her as caring, funny, helpful, and memorable, though a minority question structure and technical rigor.

Format shift

Both online and in-person comments are positive about engagement, while concerns about .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Assessment appears to mix participation, homework, quizzes, exams, videos, written assignments, and cultural activities.

Format shift

, while the online review mentions breakout room participation but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are mostly enthusiastic about her humor, care, and accessibility, with and .

Main concern

Students who need strict structure, posted grades, or advanced ASL precision may be frustrated.

What students said

“If you participate and do the .”
DEAF312

“Kim H is the life.”
SILA305

“picks favorites and grades accordingly.”
ASL123

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review is very positive and says the class still worked well through breakout rooms and participation.

Main concern

Online evidence is too limited to judge broader consistency.

What students said

“Class is so nice to attend even through COVID-19.”
DEAF312

“We do breakout rooms to work together so its not much different than the classroom.”
DEAF312

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Some reviews mention easy quizzes and , but most assessment evidence centers on participation and .

Take-Home Tests MentionedQuizzes MentionedParticipation-Based AssessmentExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention quizzes, exams, and proctoring or closed-book requirements.

Take-Home Tests MentionedQuizzes MentionedParticipation-Based Assessment

“All the .”
SILA330

“the ”
SILA300

“participate in the class and show what you understand in the exams.”
DEAF351

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book status, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“She is a great teacher and my love for the sunject grow.”
Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and structure. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Kim is a PHENOMENAL teacher!”

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“ !”

⚖️

76/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

She makes ASL really easy and fun.
She is hilarious as well as really easy going.
She challenged me, but never made me feel stupid.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

If you participate and do the .
Shes an easy.
. you won't know your grade until its posted on e-services.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Structure

Only downside is she puts in grades at the very end and sometimes assignments aren't 100% clear.
Not good for people who need structure.
She does not teach any ASL structure or grammar, uses PSE/SEE, and teaches incorrect signs.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over a long time span show a strong consistent pattern, with enough detail to identify both strengths and risks.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 535

4 out of 517

3 out of 52

2 out of 52

1 out of 53

Course coverage

SILA30516 reviews

ASL15 reviews

SILA3065 reviews

DEAF3124 reviews

SILA3163 reviews

Show 14 more courses

ASL1232 reviews

SILA3002 reviews

SILA3322 reviews

3051 review

ASL3001 review

DEAF3101 review

DEAF3511 review

FITKB1 review

L3061 review

SIGN3061 review

SILA11 review

SILA3021 review

SILA3151 review

SILA3301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 4 · A 6

B range

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Not sure yet 2

Kim Harrell

x x x x x and supportive language class, but serious ASL-track students should weigh the recurring concerns about structure and technical rigor.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

EasyA

Beginner

Mandatory

MustTake

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

👍 Recommendation Rate

⚖️ x x

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Grades

⚠️ About Structure

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

and supportive language class, but serious ASL-track students should weigh the recurring concerns about structure and technical rigor.

⚖️