AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kate Williams

MATH120 · MATH335 · MATH341 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a clear and and are willing to keep up every week.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear explanationsCaring and accessibleLecture heavyWeekly workMixed difficulty
  • Most students praise her clear, supportive teaching, especially when they keep up with notes and homework.
  • The course is not a free A because students , and steady studying.
  • Online reviews are more polarized, while but still note lecture-heavy structure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

An A is possible with , and quizzes, but several students describe the math workload as demanding.

Online evidence includes both A grades and harsh warnings, while as earned through participation and practice.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The concepts become manageable because she explains clearly, but students , and exams as challenging.

Online reviews call the structure clear but sometimes difficult, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation and lectures matter, but the reviews do not clearly prove a .

In-person reviews mention participation and lectures more often, while online reviews , and studying.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and support, but a minority strongly disliked the workload and teaching style.

, while online reviews are more split between strong praise and strong avoidance.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

criteria but several students mentioning tough quizzes, tests, and low outcomes.

Format shift

Online has the strongest complaints about grades, while .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students repeatedly mention weekly homework, quizzes, lecture-heavy classes, ALEKS, WebAssign, and regular studying.

Format shift

Both formats show steady workload, with online comments adding WebAssign and supplementary work.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most reviews praise her clear explanations, helpfulness, accessibility, and caring attitude despite several severe negative comments.

Format shift

and warmer, while online feedback ranges from excellent support to strong frustration.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and online assignments rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

Online comments mention quizzes, tests, Canvas, WebAssign, and notes, while , and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students mostly describe her as , and helpful, though the class can be lecture-heavy and demanding.

Main concern

Students need to handle long lectures, participation, and consistent weekly practice.

What students said

“This class was very challenging because and quizzes.”
MATH341
“she made the class soo enjoyable and easy to understand.”
MATH341
“she really went out of her way to get us to understand the material.”
MATH120

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online , and organized teaching, but several harsh reviews warn about workload and outcomes.

Main concern

Some online students felt the workload and .

What students said

“Her lectures are easy to understand and so you can study them later.”
MATH335
“Basically, just study and don't cheat.”
MATH120
“This was probably the worse math teacher I've had in the last couple years.”
MATH120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, tests, and exams, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam rules, Lockdown Browser, or strict proctoring.

Tests MentionedQuizzes MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or a .

Quizzes MentionedExams MentionedNo Clear Closed-Book Evidence
“ and quizzes”
MATH341
“Straight forward with her lectures, which helps with Exams and tests.”
MATH335

Online

Online reviews mention tests and quizzes, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Tests MentionedQuizzes MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Test heavy”
MATH335
“Basically, just study and don't cheat.”
MATH120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very helpful professor and one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Doesn't try to over complicate things and .”

📚 Workload Reality

35/100

“This class was very challenging because and quizzes.”

👍 Recommendation Level

72/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's really funny and makes sure you understand the topic :)
  • she made the class soo enjoyable and easy to understand.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • I had to study every week to succeed, especially after receiving a low .
  • There are if you keep up with the lectures.
  • It may feel like a lot of work, but that should be expected it is college-level math after all.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • If you ever have any questions or concerns you can always send her a message and .
  • She is a wonderful professor, and she is so helpful.
  • She's easy to contact and really wants her students to succeed.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen recent reviews across online and and mostly consistent evidence, though opinions are polarized.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH3357 reviews
MATH1205 reviews
MATH3412 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2