AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Everett Hannan

PSY300 · PYSC300 · PSYC340 · SOCPSYC301 · PSYCH340 · PSYCH300 · 300AND320 · PSCH300 · PSY340 · PSYC300 · PSYC320 · 238 lifetime ratings

AI rating
13/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

unless you can teach yourself from the textbook and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest heavyLecture heavySelf-teaching requiredHard examsLow engagement
  • Most students describe confusing, boring, or off-topic lectures that force them to rely on the textbook.
  • Grades are heavily exam-based, often with little or .
  • A small group succeeds by self-studying, but the overall recommendation signal is very poor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Some students earn A grades, but most , and strong exam performance.

The single online review says passing is manageable with hard work, while difficult exams.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The psychology content may be standard, but his lectures and many students.

Online evidence is limited, while challenging because students must self-teach.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, and lecture material, though some reviews say lateness is not strictly punished.

, while the single online review does not clearly state an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students do not recommend him because lectures are and .

Both formats are negative, but the and more detailed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Grades often depend on a few exams, though .

Format shift

In-person reviews drive this finding, while the single online review only confirms a tough experience.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

There is , but students and studying for exams.

Format shift

but high study burden, while online evidence is too limited to separate.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Students frequently describe lectures as , and poorly connected to exams.

Format shift

The single online review is negative, and the .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

Many reviews say exams make up most or all of the grade, with .

Format shift

, while online reviews do not add exam details.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews overwhelmingly describe long lectures, textbook-dependent learning, and difficult exams.

Main concern

Students often feel they must teach themselves because .

What students said

“Read the book & teach yourself.”
PSYC300
“5 exams that are 100% of your grade.”
PSYC340

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review describes a tough, self-directed experience with little teacher engagement.

Main concern

The online evidence suggests students must rely heavily on outside study to pass.

What students said

“The professor seemed disinterested in teaching.”
PSYC300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are the main risk because and are difficult or poorly aligned with lectures.

Test HeavyFew Grade ItemsDifficult ExamsStudy Guides Mentioned

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews repeatedly describe test-heavy grading with difficult exams, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring rules.

Five ExamsExams Are Most Of GradeDifficult TestsStudy Guides
“5 exams that are 100% of your grade.”
PSYC340
“exams are 75% of your total grade.”
PSCH300

Online

The single online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Read the book & teach yourself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Lectures are so boring, study , and nothing makes sense.”

🧪

90/100

“5 exams that are 100% of your grade.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ teaching yourself.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The teaching style that he teaches is very bad.
  • He just talks,talks,and talks
  • his lectures are all over the place and half the time don't tie into what he is teaching.

Theme 2

🧪 About Exams And Grades

  • and exams are 75% of your total grade.
  • makes them really hard to understand and answer.
  • Work for that A!

Theme 3

📚 About Self-Studying

  • Read the book & teach yourself.
  • If you are capable of learning independently on your own then only you'll make it.
  • Not hard if you learn the subject at home.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

238

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews over many years, with very consistent complaints about lectures, self-teaching, and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 517
3 out of 541
2 out of 572
1 out of 588

Course coverage

PSCH30011 reviews
PSYC30010 reviews
PSY3008 reviews
PSYCH3006 reviews
PSYC3405 reviews
Show 6 more courses
PSYC3203 reviews
PSY3402 reviews
SOCPSYC3012 reviews
300AND3201 review
PSYCH3401 review
PYSC3001 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 6 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 4 · B 2

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 3

D range

7

D+ 1 · D 5 · D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1