AI Rate Professor

Human Career Development

Ray Mapeso

COUNSLING · HSER300 · HSER362 · HSER350 · COUNSELOR · HCD310 · 62 lifetime ratings

AI rating
17/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
21.95%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable learning independently, handling sarcasm, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear InstructionsRude CommunicationParticipation HeavyTough GradingMixed Older Praise
  • Recent reviews are strongly negative, especially about unclear directions, poor support, and rude responses.
  • A smaller group of older reviews praises his humor, encouragement, and useful lectures.
  • Grades can be possible with attendance and participation, but many students describe the experience as stressful and confusing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Some students earned A grades by showing up and participating, but , and a real risk of failing if you fall behind.

Online evidence includes a few easy-A reports, while in-person evidence is more mixed and , and exams.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The subject matter is not always inherently hard, but , and scattered lectures make the course feel difficult.

Online reviews emphasize Canvas confusion, while and participation pressure.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Multiple reviews say showing up and participating are essential, and absence or low participation can hurt performance.

Both formats stress participation, with online reviews warning students not to forget the class and in-person reviews saying skipping class can mean failing.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most recent students would not recommend him because , and poor support.

Online and , though older in-person reviews contain more praise than recent ones.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Tags and comments frequently call him a tough or , though a few students say grades are manageable if you participate.

Format shift

Online grading ranges from easy to harsh, while and grade uncertainty.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students mention lots of homework, group projects, papers, reading, participation, and .

Format shift

Online reviews focus on Canvas assignments and group work, while , and lecture-heavy participation.

Teaching experience

Awful

24/100

Recent comments repeatedly describe unclear teaching, rude communication, and weak support despite some older positive reviews.

Format shift

Online reviews criticize organization and responsiveness, while larger split between older praise and recent complaints.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears , and some exams rather than relying on only one method.

Format shift

Online reviews mention homework, group projects, and exams, while , and several exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

complaints about disrespect and unclear guidance but older praise for engaging lectures and support.

Main concern

Many students report , and heavy reliance on participation.

What students said

“Rude and disrespectful, impolite with lack of knowledge, and willNOT welcome criticism.”
HCD310
“He gives 3 Exams, take advantage of studying with your group members.”
HSER350
“His lectures are simple and to the point, and he makes sure that .”
HCD310

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews mostly describe , and inconsistent but sometimes easy grading.

Main concern

Students and unsupported when asking questions.

What students said

“Ray's teaching style is difficult to follow.”
HCD310
“He , and when asking about assignments he gives attitude about you not listening.”
HCD310
“The class itself was very easy and the only assignment I didn't receive a 100% on was the group project.”
HCD310

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and three exams, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or closed-book requirements.

Some Test Heavy ReviewsThree Exams MentionedUnclear Exam Details

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and studying with groups, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules, open-book rules, or proctoring details.

Three ExamsGroup Study Advice
“He gives 3 Exams, take advantage of studying with your group members.”
HSER350
“Provides behavioral attitude problems whenever we ask questions about how the threeEXAMS are going to reflect those learning strategies.”
HSER350

Online

Online reviews mention exams and , but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or .

Test Heavy MentionedUnclear Exam Requirements
“Rude classroom environment discussion chats and .”
HCD310
“ ”
HCD310

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“Ray's teaching style is difficult to follow.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

22/100

“ .”

⚖️

25/100

“ and unwelcoming .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Ray's teaching style is difficult to follow.
  • His lectures are simple and to the point, and he makes sure that .
  • I honestly couldnt understand every single given detail within logical and cohesive sense of clarity whenever requesting additional help.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class itself was very easy and the only assignment I didn't receive a 100% on was the group project.
  • He will work with you for grades, but .
  • Miss his class, don't expect to pass.

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • He , and when asking about assignments he gives attitude about you not listening.
  • He was an okay teacher, but he was very rude and he did not make me feel comfortable asking questions because he always talked over me or gave me a .
  • For the first year he was my counselor, he was so rude.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

62

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 50 reviews across many years and both formats, with strong consistency in recent negative themes despite some older positive outliers.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 57
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 532

Course coverage

HCD31022 reviews
HSER30010 reviews
COUNSELOR7 reviews
COUNSLING5 reviews
HSER3503 reviews
Show 1 more courses
HSER3623 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

30 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 3 · A 6

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C 2

D range

6

D+ 2 · D 4

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

13

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Not sure yet 6 · Rather not say 1