AI Rate Professor

Journalism

Timi Poeppelman

JOUR310 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you value kindness and , but be cautious with online sections because organization may be uneven.

Best fit · Effort For RewardKind and responsiveExtra credit availableDetailed lecturesDisorganized onlineSlow grading
  • Student experience is sharply split and one negative online review.
  • Getting a high grade appears realistic because both reviewers earned A-range grades and is mentioned.
  • Online concerns , and required app use.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Both reviewers received A-range grades and is mentioned, but the negative online review suggests the grade may come with frustration.

The and an A+, while the online review reports an A despite complaints.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The positive review says the lectures were detailed and informative, while the online review suggests structure made the class harder to navigate.

, while online evidence points to disorganization rather than hard content.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

One student strongly recommends her, while the online .

The , while the online review is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

A-range grades and suggest grading is lenient, though .

Format shift

, while online evidence criticizes grading speed rather than grading strictness.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

One online review tags lots of homework, while the positive review does not describe heavy workload.

Format shift

Online evidence suggests heavier work, while .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching quality and complaints about disorganization and poor online support.

Format shift

In-person evidence is very positive, while online evidence is negative about organization and availability.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and app use, with no clear exam evidence.

Format shift

and course activities than exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The in-person review is very positive, emphasizing availability, kindness, detailed videos, , and useful writing instruction.

Main concern

The evidence is limited to one highly positive review.

What students said

“Mrs. Poeppelman was an amazing teacher!”
JOUR310
“She offers opportunities as well.”
JOUR310

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review is negative, citing disorganization, slow grading, no posted office hours, and required app use.

Main concern

Online structure and communication were the main complaints.

What students said

“ students.”
JOUR310
“She never posted office hours for her online class either.”
JOUR310

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, open-book status, or final structure.

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Mrs. Poeppelman was an amazing teacher!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting the split between positive teaching and online organization concerns. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“ and her lectures or videos were always very detailed and informative.”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“ !”

⚠️ Online Organization

45/100

“ students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and her lectures or videos were always very detailed and informative.
  • I learned a lot about writing and different topics!

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Work

  • She offers opportunities as well.
  • Plus, you are required to use an app that she never uses.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • She never posted office hours for her online class either.
  • students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews exist, and they conflict sharply across formats.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

JOUR3102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values