AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Paige Moyer

MATH300 · MATH335 · MATH400 · MATH372 · MATH120 · MATH410 · MATH125 · MATH100 · MATH333 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
42.11%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you are ready for , and a teaching style that students experience very differently.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHeavy homeworkTest heavyPolarizing teachingAttendance matters
  • Reviews are sharply split, with and many others calling the and the workload excessive.
  • Getting an A usually requires , and strong attendance.
  • , though one positive review reports open-book and open-notes tests.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

An A is possible for prepared students, but many reviews say , and .

The online evidence is harsh from one review, while but .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The math content is often described as hard or overcomplicated, even when some students .

The single online review says fundamentals were not explained, while confusing.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

, and missing class can directly hurt performance.

Attendance evidence comes mainly from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is low because the positive reviews are outweighed by , and teaching clarity.

The only , while in-person reviews are polarized with more negative risk than comfort.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Many students say and grades tests very strictly.

Format shift

Online and , but most evidence is in person.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and time-consuming math practice.

Format shift

In-person reviews give the strongest workload evidence, while the online and tests.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Some students praise clear step-by-step teaching, but , and overcomplicated methods.

Format shift

The online review is very negative, while and awful experiences.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

76/100

Reviews frequently mention tests, quizzes, practice tests, and .

Format shift

Both formats mention test-heavy assessment, but detailed quiz and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with strong praise for clear lectures in some courses and , and confusing explanations.

Main concern

Many students report , and difficult tests.

What students said

“ and harsh.”
math372
“She gives SO .”
MATH120
“ and easy to understand.”
MATH100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is strongly negative and , and test-heavy assessment.

Main concern

The review says students lose points for not using her exact method and that the .

What students said

“If you don't do a problem the EXACT way she teaches you, you won't get 100% on anything.”
MATH400
“ .”
MATH400

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but the dominant risk is strict testing with heavy emphasis on showing work exactly her way.

Test HeavyNo Calculators ReportedStrict Work FormattingOne Open Book Report

Assessment risk

Varies

39/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

some courses, and one open-book open-notes experience, so the policy is mixed.

Hard TestsNo Calculators ReportedOpen Book ReportedOpen Notes Reported
“ .”
MATH400
“ and final and .”
math372
“There are Daily quizzes and the .”
MATH120

Online

The and but does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Test HeavyStrict Work FormattingUnclear Rubric
“I've had a single test question be worth 49 points before.”
MATH400
“If you don't do a problem the EXACT way she teaches you, you won't get 100% on anything.”
MATH400

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you don't do a problem the EXACT way she teaches you, you won't get 100% on anything.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“ and easy to understand.”

⚖️

22/100

“ and harsh.”

📚 Workload Risk

24/100

“She gives SO .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are easy to follow and she shows every single step.
  • Her lessons are poorly presented as it's just walkthroughs of problems without any real explanation of why you do the things she shows.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Show all your work according to how SHE shows you or .
  • She gives you so there's no reason for you not to pass.

Theme 3

📝

  • Expect .
  • There are Daily quizzes and the .
  • No calculators allowed.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 24 reviews span many years and show consistent themes despite polarized ratings.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 510

Course coverage

MATH1008 reviews
MATH1205 reviews
MATH3352 reviews
math3722 reviews
MATH4002 reviews
Show 5 more courses
1201 review
MATH1251 review
math3001 review
math3331 review
MATH4101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 3