AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Linda Hoang

MATH384 · MATH335 · STAT300 · STATISTICS300 · MATH30 · MATH120 · MATH370 · MATH100 · STATS300 · 70 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if , and actively ask for help.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesHeavy workloadSelf-teaching requiredCaring but inconsistentStrict grading
  • Many students describe confusing, disorganized teaching that .
  • Workload , and tests.
  • Some in-person students praise her care and help, but the overall experience is highly inconsistent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A is possible for organized students, but many reviews describe , and high effort.

Online reviews make the A feel harder due to self-teaching and proctoring complaints, while students who attend and ask questions.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The math and statistics content is , and limited step-by-step support.

Online students more often describe teaching themselves, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

, and at least one online-format review says students can be dropped for missing many classes.

, while in-person evidence mainly says skipping class hurts performance.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Recommendations are sharply divided because some students find her caring and helpful, while many warn against the confusing and stressful workload.

Online reviews lean more negative, while who used her help.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Many students mention , and tests that feel harder than reviews.

Format shift

Online and in-person reviews both include tough-grader complaints, with in-person reviews adding strict class policies.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and hours of self-study.

Format shift

Online workload is often described as , while and lecture or test preparation.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Her caring attitude helps some students, but , and reliance on self-teaching.

Format shift

Online teaching complaints are more severe, while and very poor clarity.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and occasional projects, with tests and homework both important.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, tests, homework, packets, and proctored exams, while , and lecture-based exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are split, with strong praise for being caring and helpful but many complaints about , heavy work, strict grading, and disorganization.

Main concern

The class can reward persistence, but and lots of work.

What students said

“She is genuinely such a sweetheart if you pay attention.”
MATH384
“she would give 30 hw in a week”
STAT300
“Terrible teacher. Cant stay on one topic she bounces around all over the place.”
STAT300

Remote format

Online

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, with frequent complaints , and some proctored or in-person testing concerns.

Main concern

Students often feel lost online and must teach themselves while managing a heavy workload.

What students said

“I spent HOURS on youtube teaching myself.”
MATH335
“need PROCTORIO when taking tests ( Better run when you see this).”
STAT300
“ !!”
MATH335

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

proctoring, pop quizzes, test-heavy grading, and at least one online class requiring in-person tests.

ProctorioProctored ExamsPop QuizzesTest HeavyIn-Person Tests For Online Class

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a formula notecard, but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring rules.

Test HeavyMock TestsFormula Notecard
“She let us use a notecard (only formulas).”
STAT300
“Gives mock tests the class before the .”
STATS300
“ yet”
STATS300

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention Proctorio, proctored exams, pop quizzes, long timed tests, and .

ProctorioProctored ExamsPop QuizzesTimed TestsIn-Person Tests For Online Class
“need PROCTORIO when taking tests ( Better run when you see this).”
STAT300
“ ”
STATS300
“ for an online class”
MATH335

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Save your GPA and mental health and ”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“Her lectures only cover the basics of each topic so you're going to have to teach the rest yourself.”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“she would give 30 hw in a week”

👍 Recommendation Split

42/100

“Take her class if you want to learn and pass!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • the so complicated and confusing.
  • Her lectures are easy to follow and .
  • YouTube was basically how I learned EVERYTHING..

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very lecture and who are going it for GE credit!!
  • You need REAL DETERMINATION to actually pass this thing.
  • and straightforward if you put in the time and effort to study.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She cares about her students and wants .
  • She'll help you if you need assistance.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

70

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 reviews across many years and formats, with detailed and consistent , and care.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 56
3 out of 58
2 out of 57
1 out of 528

Course coverage

STAT30029 reviews
MATH3357 reviews
STATS3005 reviews
3732 reviews
MATH1202 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATH1001 review
MATH301 review
MATH3701 review
MATH3841 review
STATISTICS3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

15

A 13 · A- 2

B range

12

B+ 5 · B 5 · B- 2

C range

5

C 5

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

11

Drop/Withdrawal 6 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1