AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kaitlyn Williams

MATH110 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Only take her if and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarized lecturesExam heavyHeavy homeworkIn-person testingSelf-teaching required
  • Student experiences are and severe frustration.
  • , and often described as unforgiving.
  • Online classes may still require in-person testing, which students repeatedly call inconvenient.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Even students with , and short exams where one mistake can drop the grade.

Online has more A outcomes but still includes in-person testing, while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

The course feels challenging because homework and and require outside learning.

Both formats report math difficulty, but themselves.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Online sections still and location flexibility low.

Online reviews explicitly mention required in-person testing, while in-person .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendation depends heavily on section experience, because some students praise her clarity while others call the course frustrating and poorly supported.

Online reviews are more positive overall, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

, though partial credit may help a little.

Format shift

Both formats mention exam pressure, with .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students describe lots of , and frequent outside study needs.

Format shift

Online and demands.

Teaching experience

Poor

44/100

Teaching quality is highly polarized, but repeated complaints about bad lectures, communication, and self-teaching lower the score.

Format shift

Online evidence includes strong praise and strong criticism, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews repeatedly state that and are heavily weighted.

Format shift

Both formats are exam-centered, and online .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews , and the need to teach yourself.

Main concern

The main concern is that while lectures and .

What students said

“You're gonna have to teach yourself during HW”
math-110
“ .”
math-110
“You have to teach urself.”
math-110

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are split between excellent teaching praise and complaints that .

Main concern

The main concern is in-person testing and .

What students said

“even though it was an .”
math-110
“Horrible lectures and even though the class was online she required in person testing.”
math-110
“Math 120 was so clear and easy to follow”
math-110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The because tests are heavily weighted, short, and sometimes required in person even for online sections.

In-Person Testing For Online ClassHeavily Weighted ExamsShort ExamsTricky Questions

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe heavily weighted, short, and tricky exams, but .

Heavily Weighted ExamsShort ExamsTricky Questions
“75% of the grade is ”
math-110
“Exams are at most 10-15 questions BUT if u get just SO MUCH.”
math-110
“ and different from hw and review.”
math-110

Online

Online reviews clearly state that testing was required in person, but they do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

In-Person Testing For Online ClassTest Heavy
“even though it was an .”
math-110
“Horrible lectures and even though the class was online she required in person testing.”
math-110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You have to teach urself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

44/100

“Bad lectures, she gives practice problems that are more complex than what she taught.”

🧮

25/100

“75% of the grade is ”

📚 Workload Reality

30/100

“ class I've taken”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Horrible lectures
  • You have to teach urself.

Theme 2

📈

  • 75% of the grade is
  • .
  • Short exams, so missing one or .

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • even though it was an .
  • It was very inconvenient.
  • Math 120 was so clear and easy to follow

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Eight recent reviews provide useful detail, but opinions are sharply polarized and course labels appear inconsistent.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

math-1108 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1