AI Rate Professor

English

Sherri Coelho

WORLDLIT · ESLW340 · ENGWR302 · ENG345 · ENG000 · ENGL300 · ENG0000 · ENGLT340 · ENG302 · ENGLISH300 · ENGL340 · ENWR51 · ENG300 · ENGWR300 · ENGLISH · ENG340 · ENGLT345 · 67 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a demanding writing or literature course that can improve your skills, but if you need an easy or predictable class.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy writing workloadPassionate lecturesTough gradingDisorganized scheduleRewarding challenge
  • Students widely agree that , and serious time investment.
  • Many students find her passionate, funny, and intellectually rewarding when they can keep up.
  • Negative reviews , and a workload that can overwhelm students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Students can earn strong grades, but they repeatedly , and sustained effort.

Online evidence is limited but also time-heavy, while in-person evidence strongly shows that grades require substantial work.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

31/100

The course content is writing- and reading-intensive, often fast-moving, and requires independent thinking rather than simple completion.

The single online review points to time pressure, while in-person , and class expectations.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance appears important for participation and staying current, but reviews do not consistently prove a .

In-person reviews mention participation and showing up often; the online review .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

and serious learning, but many warn against her for , and organization.

Online evidence is too thin and lukewarm, while and strong workload complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Many students call her or her TA a , and several say high effort does not always guarantee an easy grade.

Format shift

The online review mentions TA grading and toughness, while and hard-earned grades.

Workload

Overwhelming

16/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of homework, many , and students dropping the class.

Format shift

Online evidence is limited but time-heavy, while .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

She is often described as passionate, funny, insightful, and skill-building, though disorganization and .

Format shift

The online review is mostly negative about direct teaching, while complaints about clarity and organization.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

24/100

Assessment appears , and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and and presentations.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and memorable professor whose classes are rewarding but demanding, writing-heavy, and .

Main concern

Students , and tough grading may struggle badly.

What students said

“Workload is heavy, but .”
ENGWR302
“the work load is insane.”
ENG302
“Sherri improved my writing immensely and made me into an effective critical thinker.”
ENGWR302

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only online review says the class is time-consuming, TA-graded, and easy to fall behind in without steady effort.

Main concern

The concern is workload and because the review says the TA grades everything.

What students said

“It isn't a horrible class, just make sure you dedicate enough time towards it.”
ENG300
“She makes her TA grade everything and all she does is submit the grade afterwards.”
ENG300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mostly describe papers, homework, and presentations, so mentions of in-class essays and a final.

PapersPresentationsIn-Class EssaysFinal MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book exams.

PapersPresentationsIn-Class EssaysFinal Mentioned
“write 3-5 pages per week AND put together group presentations.”
ENGWR302
“there are 2 in class essays, and 3 others”
ENGWR302
“then you can pretty much relax with the paper and final.”
ENGWR302

Online

The one online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, open-book rules, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There is a very heavy work load and it is not an easy A. You will work your butt off, but ”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course payoff. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Sherri improved my writing immensely and made me into an effective critical thinker.”

📚 Workload Reality

16/100

“Expect at least 15+ hours of .”

👍 Recommendation Fit

66/100

“If you want a challenge that is very satisfying in the end, she is the professor for you.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is so passionate about this topic and you can tell with how she delivers her lectures.
  • She is very smart and has a lot to offer, but she does not know how to do it.
  • Love the way she teaches. Interesting to listen and learn each day.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • the work load is insane.
  • Be prepared to read and study the textbook, write 3-5 pages per week AND put together group presentations.
  • Very difficult to keep up with the work!!

Theme 3

⚖️ About Grades & Payoff

  • The course load can be overwhelming at times, but as this class prepares you for upperclassman work.
  • There is a very heavy work load and it is not an easy A.
  • I did ALL the , but still ended up with a not so hot grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

67

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews across many years show detailed, consistent themes , and organization.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 527
4 out of 520
3 out of 55
2 out of 511
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENGWR30212 reviews
ENG3009 reviews
ENG3024 reviews
ENGLT3404 reviews
ENGLT3454 reviews
Show 12 more courses
ENG3402 reviews
ENG3452 reviews
ENGL3402 reviews
ENGLISH2 reviews
ESLW3402 reviews
ENG0001 review
ENG00001 review
ENGL3001 review
ENGLISH3001 review
ENGWR3001 review
ENWR511 review
WORLDLIT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 2

B range

3

B 3

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1