AI Rate Professor

English

Sherie Coelho

ENGWR302 · ENG302 · ENGWR301 · WIN15441 · ENGWR300 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
15%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

unless you want an intense writing course and can handle heavy weekly work with .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerOverwhelming workloadTough gradingMany papersUnclear organizationCan improve writing
  • Students repeatedly describe a very heavy workload with frequent papers, readings, and daily assignments.
  • as harsh, especially when a TA grades major work.
  • Some students learn a lot, but the effort cost and stress make recommendations very low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

A grades are possible, but students say they require major effort, constant writing, and .

Online reviews are especially harsh about daily work and , while hard for the grade.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The course content and structure feel challenging because students report , and intense pacing.

Both formats are challenging, with online reviews emphasizing assignment overload and , and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

, but in-person reviews warn that skipping class or falling behind hurts success.

Online flexibility is limited by frequent deadlines, while and participation are important.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

because the , and stress outweigh the learning benefits.

Both online and in-person reviews lean negative, though a few in each format say she is caring or effective for motivated students.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly describe tough grading, harsh TA grading, and .

Format shift

Online reviews strongly criticize TA grading, while .

Workload

Overwhelming

8/100

Reviews consistently mention daily , and burnout.

Format shift

Online reviews describe daily work and withdrawals, while and work that disrupts schedules.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some students say she cares and teaches writing, but , and stress-heavy course design.

Format shift

Online reviews criticize copy-pasted modules and limited teaching, while and unstable organization.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The course , and frequent written assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats focus heavily on assignments and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and , though a few students say she can teach writing well.

Main concern

The course is high effort, paper-heavy, and risky for students with a full course load.

What students said

“She grades very tough”
ENGWR302
“a ridiculous amount of work at a time”
ENGWR302
“ if youre willing to go the extra mile”
ENG302

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are mostly negative, emphasizing too , and high stress.

Main concern

The workload can dominate students' schedules and lead to burnout or withdrawal.

What students said

“ ”
ENGWR302
“there was so ”
ENGWR300
“ .”
ENGWR302

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on papers and assignments, and they do not clearly prove exam .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, midterms, or finals.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“holy cow i have never done so much work for a class in my entire life it is insane how much this woman expects you to write I was gonna take this class to fulfill a writing credit but ”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching tradeoffs; credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Intensity

8/100

“Every day is an .”

⚖️

18/100

“her TA grades pretty harshly”

🎯 Teaching Tradeoff

38/100

“Insanely hard professor but shell teach you.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • there was so
  • Every day is an .
  • Always had a .
  • I learned more in this class and .

Theme 2

⚖️

  • TA is a
  • She grades very tough
  • Marks lots of listed in the instructions

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Coelho was honestly a great teacher.
  • She does care about her students but unless you're ready to be writing an .
  • She tried, but did not succeed to improve our writing.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 20 reviews across several years are detailed and consistently warn about workload and grading.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 58
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENGWR3007 reviews
ENGWR3027 reviews
ENG3024 reviews
ENGWR3011 review
WIN154411 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 4