AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Andre Bazos

MATH8 · MATH335 · MATHMATH · MATH100 · MATH112 · MATH30 · MATH20 · MATH120 · MATH343 · MATH125 · STATS · 40 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take him if you want a and and test preparation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear explanationsLots of homeworkTough testsExtra creditHelpful professor
  • , and willingness to help.
  • The and .
  • Tests can be tricky or long, but , and make success possible.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is possible with and studying, but many students say and the workload is heavy.

Online evidence is too limited and mixed, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

His explanations make math more understandable, but the course content, homework load, and .

In-person reviews provide the main evidence and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

as strictly required, but students warn that missing class makes the course much harder.

, while online reviews do not provide enough attendance evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

Most students recommend him because he explains clearly and helps and .

, while online evidence is too small and conflicted.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

64/100

He gives , curves, and make-up credit, but and careful grading.

Format shift

In-person reviews support fair-to-lenient grading through , while online .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Many students say he assigns a lot of .

Format shift

The heavy workload finding comes mainly from in-person reviews, with one online review also tagging lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students frequently say he explains math clearly, helps outside class, and makes lectures more engaging.

Format shift

, while online teaching has only two conflicting reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

, and finals rather than a single assessment type.

Format shift

and exams most often, while online reviews give little assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show a helpful and and careful test preparation.

Main concern

and tricky tests can overwhelm students who fall behind.

What students said

“ and takes his time so everyone understands.”
MATH8
“He will assign every homework problem that he can even, odd, multiples of 3 etc.”
MATH120
“He .”
MATH30

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online evidence is split between one very negative communication complaint and one very enthusiastic recommendation.

Main concern

The small online sample makes communication quality uncertain.

What students said

“He took a though I sent him both a message on canvas and via Gmail, but it took him more than a .”
MATHMATH
“This Professor is just simply amazing. ”
STATS

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often tricky or long, but students , and , so the exam style is demanding but not unusually strict.

Tricky TestsLong ExamsExtra CreditCurveNo Trickery On Final

Assessment risk

Standard

46/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe tricky, long, and , but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Tricky TestsLong ExamsExtra CreditCurve
“He .”
MATH30
“ and you have alot of questions with very little time.”
MATH120
“No trickery on the final.”
MATH30

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and takes his time so everyone understands, while making sure the class as a whole doesnt get behind.”

Voice snapshots generated from 40 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendations. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ and takes his time so everyone understands.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“Teacher .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

74/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • One of the .
  • and takes his time so everyone understands.
  • . .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • A LOT of , and if you miss class you will be lost!
  • As long as you do all the homework and understand the material, you will walk away with an A.
  • An A is almost impossible to get.

Theme 3

📝 About Tests

  • He .
  • and you have alot of questions with very little time.
  • Testing is straight forward but not easy.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

40

Recent reviews read by the AI

40

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Forty reviews across many years provide a detailed and consistent picture, especially for in-person math classes.

Inside 40 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 58
3 out of 56
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH12513 reviews
MATH12010 reviews
MATH1004 reviews
MATH3433 reviews
MATHMATH3 reviews
Show 6 more courses
MATH302 reviews
MATH1121 review
MATH201 review
MATH3351 review
MATH81 review
STATS1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather_Not_Say 2