AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Rhonda Farley

ESLW50 · ESL310 · ESLL320 · ESLESLR · ESLG · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself and and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor teachingHard testsDelayed feedbackDisorganized gradingFriendly but ineffective
  • Students repeatedly describe weak teaching and .
  • Tests and finals are described as hard or unpleasant despite limited instruction.
  • The only positive pattern is that she can be friendly and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A looks difficult because students report , and .

The online review reports no grade, while and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The ESL content itself is not clearly described as advanced, but weak teaching makes the class harder to manage.

Online evidence is too thin, while by instruction and exams.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, though one review says she previously skipped class and later came every day.

Only in-person reviews discuss class attendance, and the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students mostly do not recommend her because they , and .

Both formats are negative, with the online review especially direct and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students report , and not knowing grades during the semester.

Format shift

, while in-person evidence describes hard and .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload volume is not the main complaint, but and .

Format shift

Online evidence lacks workload detail, while .

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Students repeatedly say she does not , and leaves them guessing about progress.

Format shift

Online evidence is negative but brief, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Comments and finals, with little evidence that .

Format shift

, while the online review does not explain assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews consistently mention poor teaching, little feedback, and .

Main concern

Weak instruction paired with and .

What students said

“You never know your grades during a semester.Also, a .”
ESLG
“She is very lazy and bad. She doesn't teach nothing, but the .”
ESL310

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is strongly negative and says the class wasted time and money.

Main concern

and low instructor effort.

What students said

“Not recommenced. Waste your time and money. I did not even get graded.”
ESL310

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe difficult tests and unpleasant finals, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Hard TestsHard FinalUnclear Exam Preparation

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals without clear proof of proctoring or book policy.

Hard TestsHard Final
“ .”
ESLESLR
“Also, she can surprise you on a .It is stressful!”
ESLG

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, open-book policy, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is very lazy and bad. She doesn't teach nothing, but the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“However, as a teacher, she is not doing well.”

⚠️

25/100

“ .”

👎 Recommendation Risk

12/100

“Not recommenced. Waste your time and money.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and you always guess as for the progress you make during a semester.
  • She is very lazy and bad. She doesn't teach nothing, but the .

Theme 2

📈

  • You never know your grades during a semester.Also, a .
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Personality

  • She is friendly, clever, and nice. I like her personality.
  • and friendly. However, as a teacher, she is not doing well.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews span many years and show consistent concerns, but several are old and short.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ESL3103 reviews
ESLG2 reviews
ESLESLR1 review
ESLL3201 review
ESLW501 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Audit/No Grade 1