AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

John Parker

MATH120 · MATH341 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you are ready for , and active self-advocacy for help.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCaring but inconsistentTest heavyHeavy homeworkTough gradingOffice hours help
  • Parker is often described as caring, patient, and .
  • The main problem is assessment difficulty, with , and .
  • Online reviews are and describe a figure-it-out-yourself teaching style.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A is possible, but students describe lots of , and exams that can be extremely hard.

Online evidence is strongly difficult, while in-person evidence shows better support but and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The math content feels challenging because students report , and difficult tests.

Online reviews describe the course as especially hard, while with focus and help-seeking.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

because students link success to not being absent and reviews include skip-class warnings.

, while online reviews emphasize participation but not a strict policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

and office-hour help, but many warn that tests and teaching consistency are problems.

In-person recommendation is mixed-positive, while online recommendation is mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

because students report , and very low test averages.

Format shift

Online reviews directly tag tough grading, while in-person reviews report very .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Workload is heavy because , and lots of homework.

Format shift

Both formats mention lots of work, with and monthly tests.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Teaching is inconsistent because students praise his care and help but and a figure-it-out approach.

Format shift

, while online reviews are much more critical of teaching clarity.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

because reviews repeatedly mention tests, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize tests, while , and monthly tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed but more positive, praising his care and help while and .

Main concern

Tests and workload can be demanding even when lectures and help are good.

What students said

“The - among 5 tests.”
MATH341
“ and is always open to answer any questions.”
MATH120

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are negative, , and nearly impossible tests.

Main concern

Students may feel forced .

What students said

“I feel like he's not really teaching, he's just going through the problems.”
MATH120
“the because of how they are written.”
MATH120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high-risk because students report , and almost impossible test design.

Test HeavyTough TestsNo Study GuidesLow Test Averages

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and no study guides, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Monthly TestsNo Study GuidesLow Test Averages
“ and , and a test every month.”
MATH341
“The - among 5 tests.”
MATH341

Online

Online reviews describe tests as extremely difficult but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Test HeavyTough TestsExam Policy Unclear
“the because of how they are written.”
MATH120
“Was on the waitlist for this class and by the end of the semester, there were only 7 people left”
MATH120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The - among 5 tests.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching support, workload, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“ and is always open to answer any questions.”

⚖️

28/100

“the because of how they are written.”

📚 Workload

30/100

“ and , and a test every month.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Parker is a caring person and a great lecturer.
  • I feel like he's not really teaching, he's just going through the problems.
  • He is a "figure it out" type of teacher

Theme 2

📈

  • Unfortunately, there are no study guides for the tests.
  • The - among 5 tests.
  • the because of how they are written.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • He's always willing to go over any homework/quiz/test problems that you need .
  • He also gives many opportunities throughout the semester!
  • and his help.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 8 reviews provide useful detail across formats, but opinions are mixed and the sample is modest.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1206 reviews
MATH3412 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1