AI Rate Professor

Human Career Development

Jacqueline Mathis

HCD310 · HCD110 · HSDHSD · 61 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

and only consider the in-person class if you can handle strict expectations, participation, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear InstructionsTough GraderParticipation HeavyPolarizing In PersonPoor Online Communication
  • Online reviews are overwhelmingly negative, , and rude communication.
  • In person reviews are split, with older students praising her as caring and motivating but and poor support.
  • , and exact formatting appear to matter heavily.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Getting an A seems possible in some in-person sections, but many students report , and grades damaged by formatting issues.

Online evidence is strongly negative about grading, while attendance-based effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The subject itself is not described as conceptually hard, but , and confusing expectations make the course feel difficult.

Online students emphasize confusing instructions, while and attendance demands.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Multiple students say skipping or being late can seriously hurt performance, and .

and punctuality, while online reviews mention mandatory meetings and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most recent and online reviews strongly warn against taking her because of , and poor communication.

, while in-person reviews include strong older praise but also later negative experiences.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students frequently call her a and say small formatting or .

Format shift

Online grading is described as especially harsh, while and punitive.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The workload includes group projects, homework, papers, pop quizzes, participation, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention lots of homework and , while in-person reviews emphasize participation, group work, and tests.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Praise for motivation and personality is outweighed by repeated complaints about unclear instructions, rude communication, and weak support in recent reviews.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is mostly poor, while and strict or confusing.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears to , and final projects.

Format shift

Online reviews mention homework, discussions, quizzes, and take-home projects, while , and essays.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person reviews are highly polarized, with many older students praising her motivation while , and weak support.

Main concern

, and group work can dominate the experience.

What students said

“Miss Mathis is a very professional and kindhearted teacher.”
HCD310
“Our student ; ; and pop quizzes with most difficult outlined syllabus contract terms and conditions stated on behalf of signing up for Human Career Development Studies.”
HCD310
“One thing not to do. Don't ever come late to class less than a second.”
HCD310

Remote format

Online

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students repeatedly , and poor email communication.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Her instructions were VERY unclear and I continuously lost points on assignments and follow instructions exactly as they were given.”
HCD310
“This professor doesn't accept late work at all.”
HCD310
“ .”
HCD310

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention pop quizzes, tests, and , but they do not clearly prove a .

Pop QuizzesTake-Home Individual ProjectTest HeavyFinal Individual Project

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and an individual final project, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Test HeavyPop QuizzesIndividual Final Project
“Setting up building block foundations for HumanCareerDevelopmentSuccess program should have involved friendly and exams, and then effectively prepare entry level scholars upon mastering academic success critical thinking areas.”
HCD110
“Our student ; ; and pop quizzes with most difficult outlined syllabus contract terms and conditions stated on behalf of signing up for Human Career Development Studies.”
HCD310

Online

Online reviews mention pop quizzes and a , but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or proctoring rules.

Pop QuizzesTake-Home Individual Project
“Students were responsible for conducting group project research and keep track of progress work and .”
HCD310
“Students were assigned group projects and pop quizzes, although with and limited understanding of graded assignments then encountered additional difficulties upon experiencing progress failures.”
HCD310

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her instructions were VERY unclear and I continuously lost points on assignments and follow instructions exactly as they were given.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Her instructions for .”

⚖️

20/100

“ . She's too picky and doesn't grade nicely.”

👍 Recommendation Level

28/100

“ .”

Theme 1

🧭 About Instructions

  • Her instructions were VERY unclear and I continuously lost points on assignments and follow instructions exactly as they were given.
  • .
  • Students received most difficult unclearHomeworkAssignmentInstructions and included typo errors putting us under the school bus costing learners overall grades.

Theme 2

⚖️ About Grades

  • This professor doesn't accept late work at all.
  • She is also extremely condescending and blames the students for her own mistakes.
  • . She's too picky and doesn't grade nicely.

Theme 3

❤️

  • Miss Mathis is a very professional and kindhearted teacher.
  • This professor genuinely cares about her students.
  • I took this class in summer. She is amazing, lectures are always creative, I like the way how she tries to connect with students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

61

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews across many years with strong format-specific patterns, though tone is highly polarized.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 527
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 529

Course coverage

HCD31042 reviews
HCD1107 reviews
HSDHSD1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

38 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

6

B+ 5 · B 1

C range

7

C+ 2 · C 2 · C- 3

D range

7

D+ 2 · D 4 · D- 1

F

7

F 7

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Not sure yet 1