AI Rate Professor

Education

Miriam Beloglovsky-Baran

ECE326 · ECE365 · ECE343 · ECE342 · ECE322 · ECE324 · ECE314 · ECE424 · ECE312 · ECE404 · ECE430 · 98 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
15.38%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid this professor unless , and a stressful communication style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh GraderUnclear InstructionsRude FeedbackHeavy ReadingStrict Participation
  • Students repeatedly , and .
  • Online reviews are especially negative about organization, communication, and discussion rules.
  • A small minority praise her as challenging and thoughtful, but most advise avoiding her.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A is possible, but , and strict interpretation of directions.

Online evidence is harsher, while few students earning A grades through heavy effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The content may not always be advanced, but vague assignments and .

Online reviews emphasize confusion and poor structure, while and challenging work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Participation and posting rules are repeatedly described as strict and tied directly to credit.

Online reviews mention required discussion timing, while as Skip class? You won't pass.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students strongly discourage taking her because of , and .

Both formats lean negative, but online students are more consistently severe in their warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough or .

Format shift

Online reviews stress zero credit and , while and finding flaws.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The , and detailed assignments that students find excessive.

Format shift

Online workload complaints are stronger, while , and hard work.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most comments describe poor communication, unclear teaching, dismissive responses, and .

Format shift

Online teaching complaints focus on organization and communication, while and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews mostly describe papers, discussions, readings, journals, and .

Format shift

Online evidence heavily emphasizes written posts and papers, while and discussions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed but still lean negative, with and .

Main concern

Students say her expectations are high while .

What students said

“She’s the type of professor who will find something wrong in everything you turn in.”
ECE322
“She has HIGH expectations of you but .”
ECE326
“ but be prepared to WORK!”
ECE430

Remote format

Online

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students most often , and stressful feedback.

Main concern

Students say they spend more time guessing expectations than learning.

What students said

“You spend more time guessing what she wants than learning.”
ECE343
“Extremely difficult grader with minimal feedback, Not clear about assignment expectations, requires way too much for an online course.”
ECE404
“terrible at giving instructions, terrible at responding back to students.”
ECE312

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam policy, and and discussions instead of exams.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam formatDiscussion-heavy gradingAssignment-heavy grading

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, midterm, or final exam rules.

Reviews do not clearly prove in-person exam policyProject and discussion evidence
“Do whatever it says on the syllabus because she grades based on what the syllabus says.”
ECE314
“If you listen to what she says in class about the .”
ECE314

Online

Online reviews do not .

Reviews do not clearly prove online exam policyDiscussion-heavy gradingAssignment-heavy grading
“About 12 of .”
ECE343
“ and again READ THE SYLLABUS.”
ECE314

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You spend more time guessing what she wants than learning.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“She doesn’t even teach anything just assigns random links for you to research then grades ridiculously tough even though she doesn’t put any effort on her end.”

⚖️

12/100

“She will give you a zero for the entire assignment.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ stress!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and vague.
  • She was very rude and dismissive to her students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She grades harder than necessary and .
  • .

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • Doesn't communicate with her students.
  • terrible at responding back to students.
  • Posted office hours but .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

98

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews across many years, many courses, and consistent repeated themes.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 511
3 out of 55
2 out of 511
1 out of 550

Course coverage

ECE31410 reviews
ECE4047 reviews
ECE3126 reviews
ECE3226 reviews
ECE3435 reviews
Show 8 more courses
ECE3264 reviews
ECE3653 reviews
ECE4303 reviews
3432 reviews
3141 review
ECE3241 review
ECE3421 review
ECE4241 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

35 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 5 · A- 1

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 2 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

17

Drop/Withdrawal 6 · Not sure yet 7 · Rather not say 4