AI Rate Professor

English

Kristina Rogers

ENGWR302 · WNGWR302 · ENGL300 · ENG302 · ENG300 · ENGLISH302 · ENGWR300 · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

She is a and can tolerate a loose, story-driven teaching style.

Best fit · Easy A HunterFunny StorytellerEasy A PotentialDiscussion HeavyEssay BasedPolarizing Style
  • as funny, engaging, and easy to pass with completed work.
  • Several students dislike the story-heavy style and say self-directed learners do better.
  • The single online review is negative, citing poor responsiveness and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

In person, many students call it an easy A if you show up and , though online requires more work.

, while the only online review says the student worked hard for the grade.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The writing workload is real, but many students say the , and manageable.

In-person reviews repeatedly describe the class as easy, while the online review reports heavier work and less help.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

Attendance is often tied to success, but reviews do .

In-person reviews frequently say to show up, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

, but the online review and a few harsh in-person complaints create real caveats.

, while the only online review clearly recommends against taking her online.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Many students report the work, despite a few tough-grader complaints.

Format shift

than the single online review.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload includes essays, journals, and reading, but many students say it is not hard if they keep up.

Format shift

In-person workload sounds manageable, while the online review explicitly reports lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most students find her funny, engaging, and helpful, but some say she does not teach enough and relies too much on stories.

Format shift

but polarizing, while online teaching support is rated poorly.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Grades , and research papers rather than exams.

Format shift

, while the online review only mentions homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews are mostly positive, describing an entertaining, easy, discussion-based class with essays and journals.

Main concern

Her personal stories and loose lecture style can frustrate students who want formal instruction.

What students said

“So like this was by far the easiest english class i have EVER had.”
ENG302
“She treats her class like she's doing a standup show.”
ENGWR300
“As long as you show up to class and do the work, you will pass her class.”
ENGWR300

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is negative and says she was rude, unavailable, and .

Main concern

Online support may be weak and .

What students said

“ helpful at all.”
ENGL300
“I worked hard and got a good grade”
ENGL300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment appears mostly writing-based and , but broader exam policies are not clearly proven.

No Final MentionedEssay BasedResearch PaperReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and writing work, and one review explicitly .

No FinalEssaysResearch Paper
“ !”
ENGWR300
“There are only 3 or 4 short papers and 1 final paper.”
ENGLISH302

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“As long as you show up to class and do the work, you will pass her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“She is very funny and makes learning fun.”

📈 Easy A Pattern

86/100

“Just do all the work and you will get an A.”

⚠️ Online Concern

78/100

“ helpful at all.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is entertaining and uses real life examples.
  • She treats her class like she's doing a standup show.
  • she doesn't really lecture. she tells stories and activities to do instead of having to lecture too much.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just do all the work and you will get an A.
  • Easy "A"!!
  • and still pass with an A

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Class time is for .
  • There is reading and .
  • There are only 3 or 4 short papers and 1 final paper.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

There are 32 reviews across many years with detailed, recurring themes, though many are old and the online sample is tiny.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 523
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENGWR30010 reviews
ENG3028 reviews
ENG3006 reviews
ENGLISH3023 reviews
ENGL3002 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ENGWR3022 reviews
WNGWR3021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1