AI Rate Professor

Literature

P Hansen

ENGWR101 · ENGWR302 · ENGWR301 · ENG101 · ENGWR300 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a supportive English class with manageable work, but .

Best fit · Effort For RewardNice and helpfulLenient deadlinesEasy journalsSlow gradingLimited feedback
  • Most students describe Hansen as kind, helpful, and approachable.
  • The class is generally manageable if students keep up with reading and homework.
  • Feedback and complaint about inconsistent late-work handling.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Getting a strong grade seems realistic with , and journals, but it is not described as a free A.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Students call the class easy and manageable, though English reading and writing still require consistent work.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

65/100

, and one review says she is understanding about lateness, but late-work handling appears inconsistent.

Only in-person reviews mention attendance or punctuality behavior.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and helpful, but and one harsh late-submission experience lower confidence.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Several comments describe easy work, flexible due dates, and helpful support, but one review reports harsh late-work enforcement.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The , and weekly journals, but students generally describe it as manageable.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Hansen is usually described as nice, helpful, and clear, though some students report limited learning and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

, and tests without showing that one assessment type dominates.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a kind, helpful professor with manageable work, but , and consistency can be uneven.

Main concern

and limited feedback may frustrate students who want detailed writing guidance.

What students said

“Very understanding professor and helpful.”
ENGWR302
“I did not learn much.”
ENGWR300
“There are weekly journals, but those are easy.”
ENGWR301

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and tests, but they do not clearly prove exam format, book policy, or proctoring rules.

Tests MentionedQuizzes MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests, but do not clearly prove the .

Tests MentionedQuizzes Mentioned
“Just read & study for tests.”
ENGWR301
“ , but resolves problems when brought up in class.”
ENGWR300

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very understanding professor and helpful.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ and will answer any questions.”

📈 Grade Effort

70/100

“As long as you keep up with the reading and .”

⚠️ Main Concern

45/100

“ . .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Really nice and chill teacher.
  • Always ready to teach and help.
  • and will answer any questions.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload And Grades

  • Easy class, she doesn't give out that much constructive criticism.
  • As long as you keep up with the reading and .
  • There are weekly journals, but those are easy.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • I did not learn much.
  • . .
  • Because she did not accept it i failed.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews provide useful patterns, but several are old and one has no meaningful comment.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

3021 review
ENG1011 review
ENGWR1011 review
ENGWR3001 review
ENGWR3011 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGWR3021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1