AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Xiaozhu Li

MATH300 · MATH20 · MATH120 · MATH110 · MATH125 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
46.15%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if and stay disciplined through homework, lectures, and difficult exams.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesTest HeavyLots of HomeworkTough GraderMixed Helpfulness
  • but lean negative, especially for MATH110 and MATH125.
  • , and homework is heavy.
  • Some students in , and possible to pass if they attended and did the homework.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some lower-level courses sound easy if homework is completed, but , and poor grade outcomes.

Online evidence suggests easy work, while and and heavy preparation.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

The course content ranges from easy algebra to confusing upper or test-heavy math, with many students struggling to follow lectures.

The single online review says the material feels easy, while and difficult exams.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and skipping class hurts your chance to pass.

Attendance pressure is supported by in-person reviews, while the online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

43/100

Recommendation depends heavily on course and student independence because positive reviews are offset by many severe complaints.

The , while in-person reviews are divided and often negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Several reviews call her a , though some courses grade homework by completion.

Format shift

and easy, while as strict or exam-driven.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Many in-person tags and comments mention lots of , and test preparation.

Format shift

The online review calls homework easy, but .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Some students find her caring and helpful, but many say she is confusing, hard to hear, unhelpful, or .

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is excellent, while and often poor.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and difficult tests, with exams carrying major risk.

Format shift

Online assessment details are vague, while , and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are inconsistent but , and limited clarity.

Main concern

Students often need to teach themselves and prepare heavily for exams.

What students said

“Awful at explaining concepts.”
MATH110
“ follow the lectures but and boring.”
MATH125
“Overall, EASY A++ prof.”
MATH20

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review is very positive and says the lectures and .

Main concern

Only one online review exists, so it may not represent the broader experience.

What students said

“She makes the course material seem easy-peasy, whereas other professors seemed to be speaking a whole other language!”
MATH300
“The lectures are easy and so is the homework.”
MATH300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because many in-person , and pop quizzes.

Hard TestsTest HeavyNo CalculatorsPop Quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly describe hard tests, test-heavy courses, no calculators in some classes, and pop quizzes.

Hard TestsTest HeavyNo CalculatorsPop Quizzes
“The 65% on the .”
MATH110
“Doesn't let us use calculators on the test.”
MATH110
“ follow the lectures but and boring.”
MATH125

Online

The online review does not clearly prove the policy, or final format.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Basically, this class was where you were just on your own to learn.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Awful at explaining concepts.”

⚖️

28/100

“She once told the class that she doesn't expect anyone to get above an 80 on one of the tests.”

📈 Difficulty & Exams

30/100

“The 65% on the .”

👍 Positive Fit

43/100

“If you show up and are even slightly conscious you should pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Awful at explaining concepts.
  • She makes the course material seem easy-peasy, whereas other professors seemed to be speaking a whole other language!
  • Basically, this class was where you were just on your own to learn.
  • She was a , but I didn't enjoy the class at all and I learned nothing.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The 65% on the .
  • Overall, EASY A++ prof.
  • I would have got an A if I put more effort into it but it was summer and I was lazy.
  • follow the lectures but and boring.

Theme 3

🧭

  • You have to go to this class, and if you do youll pass.
  • If you do the homework and feel great. The so easy.
  • I highly suggest make a study group or find someone who knows math if she is a last resort.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across several years and courses provide detailed, consistent evidence of split experiences with strong in-person risk.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH1104 reviews
MATH1253 reviews
MATH1202 reviews
MATH202 reviews
MATH3002 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Rather not say 1