AI Rate Professor

English

Constance Carter

ENGLT310 · ENGWR101 · ENGCW420 · ENGWR302 · ENGLISH101 · ENG302 · ENG301 · ENG300 · ENGW302 · ENGWR301 · ENG320 · ENG101 · ENGW300 · ENGLT321 · ENGWR300 · 108 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

unless you can teach yourself, tolerate late grades, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProExtremely Slow GradingOff Topic LecturesPoor Feedback TimingTough Paper GradingDisorganized Class
  • The dominant complaint is severely delayed grading, often after the semester ends.
  • Many students say lectures go off topic and provide little useful instruction.
  • Some students find her kind or funny, but and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Some students earned A grades with few assignments, but , and grade uncertainty make the A risky rather than easy.

Online reviews mention a few easy papers but severe grading delays, while and self-teaching concerns.

Is the course easy?

Standard

43/100

The content is not always heavy, but poor structure and off-topic class time and self-study.

Both formats report off-topic lectures, with online students emphasizing communication issues and in-person students emphasizing wasted class time.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

Attendance expectations are inconsistent, with some reviews saying participation matters and but counted.

In-person reviews provide most attendance evidence, while online reviews do not clearly define a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

because , and off-topic lectures undermine the course experience.

Both online and , though a small minority in each format praise her kindness.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Many students call her a , and delayed feedback makes grades harder to improve.

Format shift

Strict grading appears in both formats, but .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The number of assignments can be limited, but reading, papers, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention a few papers and final-focused work, while , and textbooks.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

The repeated pattern is off-topic lectures, , and weak learning value.

Format shift

Both formats show the same problems, with online reviews adding more missed communication and late Zoom issues.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment appears , and occasional projects depending on the course.

Format shift

Online reviews mention papers and finals, while , midterms, finals, and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews repeatedly describe , and inconsistent learning value.

Main concern

Students often report learning from the book instead of class while waiting weeks or months for grades.

What students said

“ !”
ENG300
“ .”
ENG302
“She does not teach and rambles in class.”
ENGWR301

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing late grading, missed or late sessions, poor communication, and .

Main concern

Grades and plan future enrollment.

What students said

“Prof. Carter failed to grade anything throughout the semester, and she has yet to publish grades from the last semester.”
ENGW300
“She is ALWAYS late and ALWAYS off topic.”
ENGWR302
“ .”
ENGWR300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, midterms, and finals, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Final MentionedOnline Quizzes MentionedMidterm MentionedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews , and finals, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Online QuizzesWeekly QuizzesMidtermFinal
“If you want to pass a text on your own and .”
ENGWR302
“ , and very few other homework assignments.”
ENGLT310

Online

Online reviews mention no tests except a final in one class, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

No Tests Only Final MentionedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring
“ .”
ENGWR300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to learn I suggest not taking her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course structure. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Did not learn anything the whole semester.”

⚖️

25/100

“Took her a year ago, she NOW just graded two things.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

24/100

“Please don't make the same mistake.”

Theme 1

⏰

  • !
  • Never expect anything to be graded on time as she is always behind and late to class most days.
  • She does not grade anything she has to until the semester ends.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was never on topic, slow to return work, and gave such negative feedback on all my work that I struggled with writing for years.
  • She goes on and on about her life and the only "teaching" she does is going over the online quizzes.
  • Coming to her class always felt like a waste of time.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A
  • You could have written a beautiful piece of work and get a whole zero on an assignment if it wasnt perfectly formatted.
  • I was still able to get high grades on the papers and final, though.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

108

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years and courses show a highly consistent pattern of and off-topic teaching.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 518
3 out of 511
2 out of 529
1 out of 528

Course coverage

ENGWR1017 reviews
ENGWR3007 reviews
ENGWR3017 reviews
ENGWR3027 reviews
ENG3005 reviews
Show 11 more courses
ENG3023 reviews
ENGW3003 reviews
ENG3012 reviews
ENGCW4202 reviews
146271 review
ENG1011 review
ENG3201 review
ENGLISH1011 review
ENGLT3101 review
ENGLT3211 review
ENGW3021 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

35 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 6

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

6

C+ 1 · C 2 · C- 3

D range

2

D 1 · D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

17

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 13 · Rather not say 1