AI Rate Professor

Nutrition

Timaree Hagenburger

NUTR300 · NUTRI350 · NUTRI303 · NUTRI300 · NUTRI370 · NUT300 · NURTI300 · 137 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
75.61%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want an engaging nutrition class and and a strong plant-based perspective.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and energeticPlant-based focusExtra creditLots of homeworkEasy quizzes
  • Students usually describe her as passionate, caring, and memorable.
  • Grades are often strong because quizzes, projects, and offset the workload.
  • The , and a strong plant-based nutrition viewpoint.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Getting an A is very realistic because quizzes, projects, and are forgiving, but students still need to keep up with steady work.

Online and , but online students describe more coordination and presentation work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The and practical, though projects and detailed instructions make the class feel busier than the concepts require.

as easy and engaging, while online reviews more often complain about workload logistics.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

52/100

Attendance is not always described as strictly mandatory, but , and in-class work make showing up important.

Online reviews mention Zoom check-ins and missed lecture follow-ups, while in-person reviews vary .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students recommend her because , and makes nutrition feel useful beyond the course.

, while online recommendation is positive but more mixed because of group work and workload.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

, and reports of no major final make grading generally forgiving despite some tough-grader complaints.

Format shift

Online and , while in-person reviews more consistently describe easy quizzes and no exams.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The class is not conceptually hard, but many reviews mention lots of , and presentations.

Format shift

Online workload feels heavier because of partner work and presentations, while but more manageable if .

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Students repeatedly , and ability to make nutrition personally meaningful.

Format shift

Both formats praise her energy, though online students are more divided about her tone and workload design.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment appears , and projects rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention presentations and projects, while , and projects with few or no major exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

students calling the class life-changing and easy if work is completed.

Main concern

lectures, and strong vegan messaging.

What students said

“ .”
NUTRI300
“Do work & you'll pass. Easy A.”
NURTI300
“NUTR 300 is easy but it requires WORK.”
NUT300

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive but mention more , and extra workload.

Main concern

Online students most often disliked group work and the amount of assignments.

What students said

“The .”
NUTRI300
“Grades hard but it is an easy class.”
NUTRI370
“For an online class to have assignments where you need to meet other classmates...”
NUTRI350

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe a student-friendly exam setup with online quizzes, little emphasis on major exams, and several comments saying there is no final or the .

No Final In Some SectionsFinal As Extra CreditOnline QuizzesOpen Book QuizzesNo Major Exams In Some Sections

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe online quizzes, open-book quizzes, no tests, and or closed-book exams.

No Tests In Some SectionsOnline QuizzesOpen Book QuizzesNo Big Final
“ .”
NUTRI300
“ but they are open book.”
NUT300
“ !”
NURTI300

Online

Online and an extra-credit final in another, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

No Final In Some SectionsFinal As Extra CreditOnline Quizzes
“She doesn't have a !”
NUTRI300
“The .”
NUTRI300
“A lot of .”
NUTRI300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“NUTR 300 is easy but it requires WORK.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“Professor Hagenburger is amazing!”

📈 Easy A Reality

86/100

“Do work & you'll pass. Easy A.”

🧾 Workload Tradeoff

48/100

“Got an A in her class but it was definitely more work than what I felt was necessary for a 3 unit class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and makes sure you leave her class with life-long knowledge that'll help you make informed nutritional choices in the future.
  • Really passionate about nutrition.
  • She genuinely cares about all of her students and it shows.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There are .
  • Do work & you'll pass. Easy A.
  • The .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Workload And Fit

  • Lots of lectures.
  • This class has so many presentations, one solo and the rest are all group presentations.
  • She HEAVILY pushes veganism on everyone.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

137

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is based on 50 reviews across many years, with consistent , and course structure.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5104
4 out of 523
3 out of 55
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

NURTI30018 reviews
NUTRI30010 reviews
NUT3009 reviews
NUTR3007 reviews
NUTRI3033 reviews
Show 2 more courses
NUTRI3502 reviews
NUTRI3701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

36 reported outcomes

A range

24

A+ 8 · A 15 · A- 1

B range

7

B+ 4 · B 3

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2