AI Rate Professor

Human Career Development

Jaqueline Mathis

HCD310 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
5/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid this professor unless , and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear expectationsTough gradingParticipation pressureGroup projectsLow support
  • , and hostile responses to questions.
  • The course uses readings, quizzes, group projects, and a .
  • One online review reports an easy A, but the broader pattern shows poor outcomes and low recommendation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Only one student called it an easy A, while most reviews , and heavy confusion.

Online evidence is mixed but mostly negative, while the and expectations.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The subject may be practical, but , and projects make the course feel difficult.

Both online and in-person comments describe unclear coursework rather than intellectually hard content alone.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly described as important or crucial.

Online , while the in-person review emphasizes participation and pop quizzes.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Most students strongly discourage taking the course because of , and .

Online reviews are mostly avoidant despite one positive review, and the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Grades and comments point , and little help when students struggled.

Format shift

, while the in-person review also warns about difficult expectations.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students describe textbook chapters, pop , and unclear requirements.

Format shift

Online reviews mention the broad workload most often, and the , and group projects.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Most comments say the professor was unclear, unsupportive, and hostile to questions.

Format shift

, and the single in-person review reports the same issue with clarification questions.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears to mix quizzes, homework, group projects, a midterm in some online comments, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, group projects, a midterm, and , while the and a take-home project instead.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single in-person review also warns against the course because of and poor attitude toward questions.

Main concern

The only and bad responses to clarification requests.

What students said

“I would cautiously advise to NOT sign up for and experienced horrible attitudes just asking questions for clarification!”
HCD310

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing unclear expectations, pop quizzes, attendance pressure, group work, and weak support.

Main concern

Students often felt unsupported and .

What students said

“Asking questions and making comments were completely unacceptable during lecture instruction.”
HCD310
“Upon requesting help all we got was failure results and reluctance to assistances.”
HCD310

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly mention pop quizzes and projects, but and review.

Pop QuizzesMidterm MentionedNo Final Exam In Some ReviewsTake-Home Final Project

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The exam and instead a take-home individual project.

No Final ExamTake-Home Individual ProjectPop Quizzes
“ and instead .”
HCD310

Online

, and final projects, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Pop QuizzesMidterm MentionedFinal Project
“ ; quizzes; group projects; midterm exam and ”
HCD310
“ project instead.”
HCD310

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ".”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“Asking questions and making comments were completely unacceptable during lecture instruction.”

⚖️

12/100

“Upon requesting help all we got was failure results and reluctance to assistances.”

📚 Workload Load

25/100

“Coursework load involved textbook chapter assignments with .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Asking questions and making comments were completely unacceptable during lecture instruction.
  • barely learned career planning plus undermined question asking skills throughout learning processes.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • ".
  • The advised learning criteria requirements were associated with ; quizzes; group projects; midterm exam and

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Structure

  • Human Career Development Success program.
  • I would cautiously advise to NOT sign up for

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews are recent and detailed, but one positive outlier conflicts with the broader negative pattern.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

HCD3106 reviews

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1