AI Rate Professor

Communication

Leah Myers

COMM361 · COMM301 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

unless , and managing the course largely on your own.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor communicationDelayed gradesLittle feedbackVery easy workloadFormat problems
  • Most reviews say she , and poor communication despite the communication subject area.
  • The course appears very easy by difficulty ratings, but the easy workload does not compensate for grade uncertainty and weak teaching.
  • , but five of six reviews are strongly negative or hesitant.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

The workload and difficulty seem low, but and make the path to an A uncertain.

Both online and , but both also include complaints about missing or delayed grades.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

Difficulty ratings are consistently very low, suggesting the content itself is easy even when teaching quality is poor.

Online and in-person reviews both show easy course difficulty, though poor communication affects the experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly establish a , though one online tag says skipping class may hurt passing.

Online evidence hints attendance may matter, while policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

because , and communication are unreliable.

Online reviews are strongly negative, while because one student had a very positive experience.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

The course seems easy, but , and limited feedback make grading feel unreliable rather than generous.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize delayed and obscure grading, while .

Workload

Featherlight

92/100

Every difficulty rating is 1, and complaints focus on communication rather than heavy work.

Format shift

Both online and .

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Most students describe , and weak teaching support.

Format shift

Online reviews are consistently poor, while and two detailed negative reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention speeches, outlines, quizzes, and a and .

Format shift

Online reviews specifically mention quizzes and the , while and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed, with one very positive review but two detailed complaints , and .

Main concern

Most in-person evidence warns that grades and .

What students said

“She did not post any grades all semester until it was the .”
COMM301
“Learned a lot and it helped me land a position at the state.”
COMM361

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are very negative, and final, obsolete material, and little feedback.

Main concern

Students could not .

What students said

“Doesn't give grades in a timely fashion, doesn't use canvas at all, and all quizzes and the .”
COMM301
“Doesn't teach at all”
COMM301

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and a but do not clearly prove whether exams are open-book, proctored, webcam-based, or closed-book.

Email QuizzesEmail FinalSpeechesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention speeches and quizzes but do not clearly prove final format, proctoring, open-book, or .

SpeechesQuizzes
“She only gave grades for one speech of five and .”
COMM301

Online

Online reviews say all quizzes and the , but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Email QuizzesEmail Final
“all quizzes and the ”
COMM301

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“For a communication teacher, her communication is the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and feedback. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“Doesn't teach at all”

⏱️

18/100

“most of .”

📉 Grade Clarity

45/100

“ , and she was very delayed in ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • For a communication teacher, her communication is the .
  • Doesn't teach at all
  • Her lecture material was obsolete and not really relevant to overall progress and understanding.

Theme 2

📝

  • She did not post any grades all semester until it was the .
  • Doesn't give grades in a
  • .

Theme 3

📚 About Course Experience

  • Learned a lot and it helped me land a position at the state.
  • Textbook completely online.
  • all quizzes and the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Six recent reviews give detailed and mostly consistent complaints, but the sample is small and includes one strong positive outlier.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

COMM3015 reviews
COMM3611 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2