AI Rate Professor

English

Kim Limon

ENGWR101 · ENGWR302 · ENGWR300 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
91.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want a rewarding writing class and are willing to read, participate, and revise.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrong Writing FeedbackDiscussion DrivenReading HeavyClear CriteriaEngaging Teacher
  • Students , and ability to improve writing.
  • The , and attendance.
  • Grades are very good for students who keep up, but one review reports a harsh personal experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

An A is very realistic if students complete the , and write carefully, but it is not effortless.

work, while the lone online review warns about harder MLA and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The course is manageable but reading-heavy and writing-focused, so it requires consistent effort rather than raw difficulty.

and essays, while online evidence adds careful grammar and MLA expectations.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Attendance and participation matter because discussions, journals, and in-class work are central to success.

, while the single online review only mentions participation.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students recommend her because , and helps them become better writers.

In-person reviews are strongly enthusiastic, while the single online review is positive but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Grades are high for prepared students, but comments show she expects careful writing, MLA accuracy, and timely work.

Format shift

, while online evidence specifically says MLA and grammar are graded hard.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload includes several essays, readings, journals, discussions, and sometimes presentations, but students say it is manageable.

Format shift

In-person reviews describe the workload in detail, while and careful writing expectations.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students consistently describe her as engaging, passionate, discussion-oriented, and highly effective at teaching writing.

Format shift

, while the lone online review also calls her a great teacher.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment appears centered on essays, annotated bibliography work, journals, reading responses, discussions, and presentations.

Format shift

In-person evidence strongly supports assignment-based assessment, while online evidence mentions .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly positive, , and real writing growth.

Main concern

Students must keep up with reading, participation, and essays.

What students said

“I left feeling like a stronger writer and that I learned a lot”
ENGWR300
“Honestly the ”
ENGWR302

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review praises her care and teaching but warns that MLA and .

Main concern

Online evidence is limited and .

What students said

“she grades hard with MLA format and grammar”
ENGWR300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a regular exam format, so but .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews focus on essays, readings, discussions, journals, and presentations, but .

Essay Based WorkDiscussion Based Work
“4 essays, and an .”
ENGWR300
“Basically all we did was read and then discuss the reading as a class the next day”
ENGWR300

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I left feeling like a stronger writer and that I learned a lot :)”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and writing growth. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“Prof. Limon was the person who made me a great writer.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Balance

55/100

“You have to read and write a lot, but she's definitely a great professor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She lets the class lead with
  • She knows how to get you engaged in class
  • Professor Limon is amazing, and I wish more professors were like her!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you do all your work and try hard, you can get an A.
  • Show up, do your work, and you'll pass
  • This is a class you definitely have to put work into for a good grade

Theme 3

✍️ About Writing Growth

  • I left feeling like a stronger writer and that I learned a lot
  • Prof. Limon was the person who made me a great writer.
  • really helps you to think critically

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

93/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve detailed reviews across several years are consistent, grade-supported, and mostly enthusiastic.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGWR3008 reviews
ENGWR3023 reviews
ENGWR1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 3 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1