AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ben Hee

MATH300 · MATH100 · MATH30 · MATH20 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you are already comfortable with math and can handle self-teaching.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-Teaching RequiredTest HeavyMixed ReviewsStrict Math SetupPatient In Some Classes
  • and says students must teach themselves.
  • In-person reviews and and unsupported.
  • Success depends heavily on prior math confidence, note-taking, and independent work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Even students who earned an A describe working very hard, self-teaching, and .

Online evidence is strongly hard-work-for-A, while and effort but not easy for weaker math students.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The course feels challenging because , and limited support.

Online review is very challenging, while and student math confidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Comments suggest attendance and note-taking matter, but .

In-person reviews say paying attention to lectures matters, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is low because multiple students warn about self-teaching, poor support, and dropping the class.

Online evidence says never again, while patience.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Reviews mention no , no buffers, graded homework, and hard tests, despite one positive review about scoring opportunities.

Format shift

, while but includes strict policies in Math 300.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students report lots of , and heavy work for an A.

Format shift

Online review clearly reports lots of homework, while 300.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Some students call him patient and helpful, but and students must teach themselves.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is very negative, while and inadequate clarification.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

Reviews , and an early exam.

Format shift

Online review is test-heavy, and in-person , and exam restrictions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

lower-level math and serious complaints about poor guidance in Math 300.

Main concern

Students who struggle with math may not get enough clarification or support.

What students said

“If you pay attention to the , and do the work you should be able to pass his class.”
MATH20
“Lectures will have you lost, you basically have to teach yourself using the book.”
MATH300

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is highly negative and says the course relied on a dated workbook with little instructor-created support.

Main concern

Students may need to teach themselves and work hard despite aiming for a high grade.

What students said

“Unless you're ready to teach yourself literally all the .”
MATH300
“Had to work so hard for an A”
MATH300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, including no calculator, no study guides, early exams, and tests unlike homework.

Test HeavyNo CalculatorEarly ExamNo Study GuidesHomework-Test Mismatch

Assessment risk

Strict

24/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention no calculator, no study guides, an early exam, and , but do not clearly prove proctoring or .

No CalculatorNo Study GuidesEarly ExamNo Extra Credit
“ ”
MATH300
“There is an .”
MATH300

Online

The online review says tests and quizzes were not made by him and differed from homework, but .

Test HeavyHomework-Test Mismatch
“Test and .”
MATH300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Unless you're ready to teach yourself literally all the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and mixed instructor support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“Lectures will have you lost, you basically have to teach yourself using the book.”

📈 Easy A Potential

30/100

“Had to work so hard for an A”

🧪

24/100

“Test and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He really works hard to help and is the .
  • He didn't make any of .
  • He would only go over the book and not offer enough clarification.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you pay attention to the , and do the work you should be able to pass his class.
  • No , no buffers.
  • Had to work so hard for an A

Theme 3

🧪 About Tests

  • Test and .
  • He and no notes on test.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

, but they contain concrete details and show a consistent risk of self-teaching in harder courses.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH3003 reviews
207031 review
MATH1001 review
MATH201 review
MATH301 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2