AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Anna Goldfield

ANTH336 · ANTH301 · ANTH300 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a supportive anthropology professor with , and a very realistic path to an A.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringEasy To FollowEasy ALow Exam PressureExtra Credit
  • Students unanimously praise her as caring, approachable, and easy to follow.
  • Grades are very strong, with every reported grade being an A or A+.
  • The workload is light to moderate, with , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

93/100

Every reported grade is an A or A+, and comments describe , and supportive grading.

Online reviews show especially flexible grading, while notes, labs, and memorization.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Students say lectures are easy to follow and , though some memorization and lab work remain.

Online content appears lighter and more flexible, while , and memorization.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

72/100

Online Zoom check-ins are optional, but for success.

Online evidence supports optional participation, while , notes, and quizzes.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

100/100

Every review is highly positive because , and makes anthropology manageable.

Both online and recommendation evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

94/100

Reported grades are all A or A+, with , notecard support, and manageable assignments mentioned.

Format shift

Both formats show generous outcomes, with online reviews giving the clearest low-pressure evidence.

Workload

Light

82/100

, and a project, but students repeatedly describe it as manageable or easy.

Format shift

Online workload is lighter and more flexible, while and memorization but remains manageable.

Teaching experience

Excellent

100/100

Students consistently describe her as , and passionate.

Format shift

Teaching praise is equally strong across online and in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and lecture-based work more than traditional exams.

Format shift

Online reviews include weekly worksheets and a final project, while , and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews praise easy-to-follow lectures, caring support, , and manageable quizzes or tests when students pay attention.

Main concern

, and a mandatory workbook.

What students said

“Her lectures were really easy to follow and she had a great passion for anthropology.”
ANTH300
“ but she gave us a note card .”
ANTH301

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews describe a flexible, caring class with weekly worksheets, optional Zoom check-ins, and .

Main concern

Students still need to keep up with and a .

What students said

“ , but there is a .”
ANTH336
“We had to check in once a week on zoom , but .”
ANTH300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is student-friendly because one online course had no exam or midterm and .

No Exam Or MidtermFinal ProjectOptional Zoom Check-InNotecard AllowedLecture-Based Quizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

90/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests with a notecard, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Lecture-Based QuizzesNotecard Allowed
“the so .”
ANTH300
“she gave us a note card .”
ANTH301

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention no exam or midterm in one course and optional Zoom check-ins in another, with no evidence of .

No Exam Or MidtermFinal ProjectOptional Zoom Check-In
“ , but there is a .”
ANTH336
“We had to check in once a week on zoom , but .”
ANTH300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her lectures were really easy to follow and she had a great passion for anthropology.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

100/100

“Dr. Goldfield was a great prof and really seemed to care about her students.”

📈 Easy A Path

93/100

“The , as long as you watched the lectures beforehand.”

🧪

90/100

“ , but there is a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The lectures were easy to follow along with.
  • , and so very easy going.
  • Dr G is amazing professor that and nice.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The , as long as you watched the lectures beforehand.
  • I was able to finish the class with 103% .
  • If and pay attention, you should be fine.

Theme 3

📝

  • , but there is a .
  • She gives out weekly worksheets to do based on lectures and readings.
  • the so .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because six reviews are consistent and detailed, but the sample size is still limited.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ANTH3003 reviews
ANTH3012 reviews
ANTH3361 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 4 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values