AI Rate Professor

Not Specified

Dawn Howe

ANSC305 · ANSC302 · ANSC304 · ANSC306 · ANSC303 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
80/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want an engaged, hands-on instructor and are willing to attend and keep up with the assigned work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and knowledgeableHands-on classesUsually fair gradingAttendance mattersOrganization varies
  • as , and passionate.
  • Grades are often manageable when students attend, pay attention, and complete the work.
  • One online review and one in-person review report confusing organization, difficult tests, or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Several students say grades are manageable or easy if you pay attention and do the assigned work, but one calls it the hardest A they earned.

Online evidence says the class was easy, while exception.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course content is often described as straightforward, hands-on, and easy to follow, though and difficult.

Online content was called easy but shallow, while in-person courses were usually accessible with occasional difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

, and tests and quizzes rely on reading and lecture material.

; the online review does not clearly prove an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most in-person students recommend her for being knowledgeable, caring, and fair, but the online review and .

, while the only online review would not take her again.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Students often describe grading as easy or fair, but and .

Format shift

Online mentions grading errors, while .

Workload

Moderate

60/100

, and quizzes, but most students do not describe it as overwhelming.

Format shift

Online work sounded light, while , and tests.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most in-person students praise Howe as , and knowledgeable, despite serious organization complaints in a minority of reviews.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is negative, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention , and hands-on work.

Format shift

Online evidence focuses on tests and lecture files, while , and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, emphasizing clear expectations, hands-on learning, and .

Main concern

Some students may struggle when due dates, essays, or .

What students said

“Grades pretty easily.”
ANSC306
“ and unclear.”
ANSC303

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review says the course was easy but poorly taught, with weak access to the instructor and .

Main concern

The student felt they would not learn much and .

What students said

“You won't learn but it was easy”
ANSC304

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and quizzes based on readings and lectures, with one online concern about not seeing completed tests.

Tests and QuizzesReading and Lecture MaterialSubjective TestsNo Test Review

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes based on reading and lecture material, with one complaint that tests are subjective and difficult.

Tests and QuizzesReading and Lecture MaterialSubjective Tests
“tests and and lecture material.”
ANSC302
“ and difficult.”
ANSC303

Online

The online review says students were , but it does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

No Test Review
“Not allowed to see the ”
ANSC304

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She genuinely wants her students to learn and do well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“She genuinely wants her students to learn and do well.”

📈 Grade Value

78/100

“Easy A if you pay attention and do the work assigned.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

60/100

“ and unclear.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is easy to listen to and has a great grasp of her subject.
  • and is passionate about the subjects she teaches.
  • Dawn is a very smart and nice person.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Difficulty

  • Grades pretty easily.
  • Easy A if you pay attention and do the work assigned.
  • Grades harshly even though I got an A, hardest A ever earned.

Theme 3

🧪 About Class Experience

  • You get to work hands on with her horses!
  • and straight out of the book and lecture.
  • You won't learn but it was easy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews across many years give useful themes, but recent evidence is limited and the only online review conflicts with most in-person reviews.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ANSC3023 reviews
ANSC3062 reviews
ANSC3031 review
ANSC3041 review
ANSC3051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1