Dana Wassmer

NUTR300 · NUTRI310 · DIETTECH · NUTRITION · NUTRI300ONLIN · NUTRITION300 · NUTR310 · NUTRI340 · NUTRI300 · CLASS · NUT340 · FCS324 · NUTRI30 · 50 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 12/100
RMP rating: 2.6/5
Take again: 31.25%
Difficulty: 3.8

The decision

unless you can handle strict grading, difficult exams, exact wording expectations, and heavy self-management.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHard examsStrict wordingExtra creditMixed organization

Students frequently say the content can be simple, but grading and exams make the class stressful.
Online and in-person-labeled reviews both contain , and hard timed tests.
A minority of students , and nutrition knowledge.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Some students report easy A outcomes with reading and , but many say strict grading and .

Online reviews are more directly negative about A difficulty, while in-person-labeled reviews .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Nutrition content is often described as understandable, but , and exact wording requirements make the course feel harder.

Both formats suggest the material itself can be manageable, but assessment design sharply increases difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, and many reviews focus on online discussions, reading, and .

Online reviews emphasize discussion participation, while attendance rule.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most negative reviews discourage taking her because of , and discouraging communication.

Both online and in-person-labeled reviews contain strong avoid warnings, despite a few positive comments about organization and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students repeatedly describe strict , and little room for error.

Format shift

Online , and in-person-labeled reviews repeat the same concern.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Assignments may be few, but , and strict word counts make the workload feel heavy.

Format shift

Online reviews stress weekly discussions and exams, while , and reading.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Positive comments mention organization and quick replies, but , and weak teaching support.

Format shift

Online reviews are especially harsh, while but still contain many serious complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades appear exam-heavy, with multiple , and few recovery opportunities.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize exams, with and diet analysis projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews also include many online-course comments, but the authoritative format count shows a larger mixed set with and .

Main concern

, and harsh grading dominate the negative reviews.

What students said

“She grades hard on everything.”
NUT340

“ if you don't pass, your whole grade will decrease.”
14150

“The material is not difficult at all.”
NUTRI300

Remote format

Online

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are highly polarized but mostly warn , and unclear expectations.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“This was the hardest grade I've ever had to work for.”
NUTRI310

“ . At all.”
NUTR310

“Class was really easy.”
NUTR300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because students , and strict grading, while proctoring rules are not clearly proven.

Hard ExamsTimed TestsEssay QuestionsLowest Exam DroppedTake-Home Final

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

test time, and a take-home final, but do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Hard ExamsLimited Test TimeEssay QuestionsTake-Home Final

“She doesnt give enough time on tests because almost impossible to finish the multiple choice questions in time.”
NUT340

“ if you don't pass, your whole grade will decrease.”
14150

“Only 4 test, however .”
NUTRI310

Online

Online reviews mention four exams, a , and strict discussion rules, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Four ExamsFinal ExamLowest Exam DroppedFree Response QuestionsHard Timed Tests

“ and half free response.”
NUTRI310

“She has 4 exams and drops 1 of the lowest scores, but .”
NUTRI310

“ so I didn't score well on them in the allotted time.”
NUTR310

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“This was the hardest grade I've ever had to work for.”
Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

15/100

“She has VERY strict criteria and if you submit something that does not fit her exact style of presentation she .”

🧪

18/100

“ . At all.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“She is not clear with her expectations nor with her instructions.”

Theme 1

⚖️

She grades hard on everything.
Zero room for error.
She finds the most small errors that it feels impossible to get anything over an 85.

Theme 2

🧪 About Exams

and half free response.
The , and the textbook wasn't any help.
She set a very unforgiving .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

Discussion boards have to have 200 word post and 200 word reply.
You have to put your effort into it to get a good grade overall.
A lot of reading though

Theme 4

✅ Positive Notes

.
and online postings.
She does give a lot of easy opportunities.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews with detailed, repeated complaints across many years make the pattern credible despite some format-label noise and mixed positives.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58

4 out of 513

3 out of 54

2 out of 57

1 out of 518

Course coverage

NUTRI3009 reviews

NUTR3108 reviews

NUTRI3108 reviews

NUTR3007 reviews

NUTRI3405 reviews

Show 10 more courses

NUT3402 reviews

NUTRI300ONLIN2 reviews

NUTRITION2 reviews

141501 review

3401 review

CLASS1 review

DIETTECH1 review

FCS3241 review

NUTRI301 review

NUTRITION3001 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 3 · A 1

B range

B 3 · B- 2

C range

C+ 2 · C 2

D range

D 1

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1

Dana Wassmer

x x unless you can handle strict grading, difficult exams, exact wording expectations, and heavy self-management.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

HardWork

Standard

Varies

Avoid

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

⚖️ x x

🧪 x x

🎯 Teaching Quality

⚖️ x x

🧪 About Exams

📚 About Workload

✅ Positive Notes

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

unless you can handle strict grading, difficult exams, exact wording expectations, and heavy self-management.

⚖️

🧪

⚖️