AI Rate Professor

Nutrition

Susan Chou

NUTR300 · NUTRITION · NUTRI300 · NUTRI · NUT300 · NURTI300 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

if you want a demanding nutrition course and , and the textbook.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerInformation overloadHard testsPowerPoint-heavyHeavy readingMixed teaching quality
  • Students consistently describe the course as information-heavy and difficult, especially because of .
  • Teaching reviews are mixed, with some praising her knowledge and clarity while many call lectures boring or unclear.
  • Online reviews are especially negative, describing heavy workload and poor value for a GE course.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Students say you must work hard, absorb heavy detail, and still may .

Online reviews stress overwhelming weekly work, while and detailed test questions.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Nutrition content is described as information overload with , and difficult exams.

Both formats describe the course as difficult, with online reviews emphasizing workload and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

38/100

as mandatory, but in-person students say attending and paying attention are key to a good grade.

The attendance evidence comes from in-person reviews, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Most students advise against taking her because the workload, tests, and lecture style feel frustrating and inefficient.

Online reviews are uniformly negative, while but still lean negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Grades depend on mastering detailed notes and averages.

Format shift

Online reviews mention tough grading, while and low averages.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Reviews describe lots of , and 15 to 20 hours of work in one online week.

Format shift

Online workload complaints are more intense, while , and test preparation.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Some students call her knowledgeable and helpful, but .

Format shift

Online teaching reviews are very negative, while and and unclear.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

, while online comments also mention homework, reading, and papers.

Format shift

, while online reviews point to a broader workload with assignments and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed but , and heavy information load.

Main concern

and often focus on large amounts of detailed material.

What students said

“ and many questions focus on less relevent .”
NUT300
“The mid 40's!”
NUTRI300

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are strongly negative and , and information overload.

Main concern

The online workload feels excessive and discouraging for a GE course.

What students said

“ if you want to learn anything about nutrition or succeed in any of your other classes.”
NURTI300
“There is enough work in one week to require about 15 - 20 hours and for what? It's a GE.”
NUTRI300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear strict because students and low averages, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, or closed-book rules.

Hard TestsDetail-Heavy QuestionsLow Test AveragesPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Strict

24/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews repeatedly , but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring.

Hard TestsDetail-Heavy QuestionsLow Test Averages
“ and many questions focus on less relevent .”
NUT300
“The mid 40's!”
NUTRI300

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, quiz format, midterm format, or .

Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I'm 2 weeks into her online class and . Information overload.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course difficulty. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“ . She just assumes everyone knows what she is talking about.”

🧪

24/100

“ and many questions focus on less relevent .”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“There is enough work in one week to require about 15 - 20 hours and for what? It's a GE.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and speaks very clearly about all topics.
  • be updated.
  • I think her class is boring because all she does is read from the ...EVERYDAY!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She makes you work for your grade!
  • I am an A student and found this class to be extremely difficult.
  • The mid 40's!

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Information overload.
  • Lots of .
  • Read the chapters twice and don't listen to what she says.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 13 reviews span many years and consistently , and PowerPoint-heavy teaching.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

NUTRI3006 reviews
NUT3002 reviews
NUTRITION2 reviews
NURTI3001 review
NUTR3001 review
Show 1 more courses
NUTRI1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values