AI Rate Professor

Science

Clair Thunes

ANSC304 · ANSC302 · ANSC305 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
5/100
RMP rating
1.1/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

unless you can teach yourself, tolerate poor communication, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnresponsiveHarsh GradingHeavy WorkloadUnclear LecturesAvoid
  • Students repeatedly say she does not answer emails or questions.
  • as , and harsh.
  • Both online and and difficult courses.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students report , and low grades despite effort.

Online reviews stress missing grades and , while and difficult classes.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

The course content is treated as difficult because students , and hard without prior knowledge.

and weak preparation, while in-person reviews describe dull lectures and content that feels nearly impossible for beginners.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

because students mention required content downloads and warnings that skipping means failing.

Both formats include participation or attendance complaints, including content-download tracking in online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

2/100

Students overwhelmingly do not recommend her because of , and weak teaching support.

Both online and showing a meaningful positive pattern.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

Students repeatedly describe grading as , and damaging to GPA.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize missing and inconsistent grades, while .

Workload

Heavy

18/100

Students mention , and rough course demands.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the clearest workload complaints, while and test heaviness.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Students describe her as , and unwilling to help with questions or concerns.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on no response and , while and poor explanations.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews , and lectures, so assessment is mixed rather than purely exam-based.

Format shift

Online reviews mention tests, papers, participation, and projects, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe boring , and .

Main concern

Students say lectures are dull and support is very limited.

What students said

“Most boring and uninteresting class that i have taken.”
ANSC304
“She will Not respond to any of your questions or concerns.”
ANSC305
“Her classes are bordering on impossible if you have no prior knowledge of the subject.”
ANSC304

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are extremely negative, focused on no email response, missing grades, heavy work, and .

Main concern

Students may not receive feedback, grades, or answers when they need help.

What students said

“ .”
ANSC305
“ .”
ANSC305
“This class has been one of the most frustrating of my college career.”
ANSC305

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and poor clarity, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or closed-book rules.

Test HeavyBook-Based TestsUnclear MidtermStudy Guide Weakness

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, proctoring, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Test Heavy
“TEST HEAVY”
ANSC304

Online

, and weak study preparation, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book policies.

Book-Based TestsUnclear MidtermWeak Study Guide
“ and a lot from the book.”
ANSC305
“She has grammatical errors EVERYWHERE even on the midterm so nothing makes sense and .”
ANSC305
“For the little to prepare you.”
ANSC302

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

8/100

“She will Not respond to any of your questions or concerns.”

⚖️

5/100

“ and doesn't make sense.”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

2/100

“ if you care about your GPA”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Most boring and uninteresting class that i have taken.
  • She literally reads from the powerpoint.
  • Her lectures are dull and she goes off subject constantly.

Theme 2

📉 About Grades And Workload

  • .
  • This class is rough I have no idea if ill pass bc she hasn't graded.
  • She grades the absolute worse.

Theme 3

📬 About Communication

  • .
  • She will Not respond to any of your questions or concerns.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews across several years are highly consistent , and weak teaching.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ANSC3057 reviews
ANSC3043 reviews
ANSC3021 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1