AI Rate Professor

Fire Technology

Al lannone

FT301 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid unless you and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProWeak LecturesDifficult ExamsHeavy ReadingFrustrating Course
  • The only review describes very weak lectures and difficult exams.
  • Getting a high grade appears hard even with heavy study effort.
  • Online evidence is negative, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

The student studied heavily and still averaged only 80% on difficult exams, so an A appears very hard.

Evidence comes only from one online review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course content is reading-heavy and .

Evidence comes only from one online review.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review does not clearly state an .

Only online evidence exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The only student called it the most frustrating class they had taken and .

The recommendation evidence is entirely from the online section.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

because heavy preparation still produced only an 80% exam average.

Format shift

Only the .

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

The review mentions required chapters, flashcards, study guides, pop quizzes, and many papers.

Format shift

Only online workload evidence is available.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

The student says the lectures are extremely weak and function like a table of contents.

Format shift

Teaching evidence comes only from the online review.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

The course appears to , and papers.

Format shift

Only online assessment evidence is available.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review reports weak , and difficult exams.

Main concern

because lectures are described as extremely weak.

What students said

“The , creating flashcards, completing study guides, I was only able to average 80% on the exams.”
FT301
“His lectures are extremely weak has in grade school weak, they are basically a table of contents.”
FT301

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention difficult exams and pop quizzes, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Difficult ExamsPop Quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The online review reports difficult exams and pop quizzes, but .

Difficult ExamsPop Quizzes
“The , creating flashcards, completing study guides, I was only able to average 80% on the exams.”
FT301

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“FT 301 taught by Al Iannone was probably the most frustrating class I have ever taken.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting teaching, workload, and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“His lectures are extremely weak has in grade school weak, they are basically a table of contents.”

📉

15/100

“The , creating flashcards, completing study guides, I was only able to average 80% on the exams.”

⚠️ Overall Experience

5/100

“FT 301 taught by Al Iannone was probably the most frustrating class I have ever taken.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are extremely weak has in grade school weak, they are basically a table of contents.

Theme 2

📚

  • The , creating flashcards, completing study guides, I was only able to average 80% on the exams.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review, even though it is detailed and internally consistent.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

FT3011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values