AI Rate Professor

Economics

Misha Sarkovich

ECON304 · ECON302 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can teach yourself economics and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProExam-heavy gradingSelf-taught structureNo homeworkConfusing lecturesCheat sheet allowed
  • The course is usually graded by only a .
  • some call it an easy A with attention, while others say the and self-taught.
  • Online evidence is especially weak because the review reports no live or recorded lectures.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A can be easy for attentive self-starters because there is , but .

In-person reviews include easy-A claims, while the and less support.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The concepts and exams feel challenging because and students often must learn from notes or articles.

Online is harder due to , while hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

Attendance seems important for success because students say paying attention in class helps, but .

In-person evidence suggests attendance is useful, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Most negative reviews warn that and .

Online evidence is negative, and and easy-A praise.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

One review calls him lenient and mentions dropping the , but .

Format shift

In-person evidence includes leniency, while online .

Workload

Light

72/100

There is little or , but students must independently study for .

Format shift

, while online work is mostly reading articles without lecture support.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Several students describe confusing teaching, , and a self-taught course structure despite two strong positive reviews.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is very poor, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

92/100

Grades are repeatedly described as .

Format shift

, while online evidence describes studying to pass but no clear assessment details.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are split between students who found the and and exams hard.

Main concern

Grades depend heavily on a few exams, so .

What students said

“Graded only by 3 exams.”
ECON302
“super easy A if you pay enough attention in class”
ECON302
“ .”
ECON304

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review is negative and says there were no live or recorded lectures, only articles to read independently.

Main concern

Online students may need to learn the material on their own.

What students said

“professor decided .”
ECON302
“Sends articles instead for the class to read and understand on their own.”
ECON302

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are central and sometimes student-friendly with cheat sheets and multiple choice, but several students still found them difficult or mismatched with teaching.

Three ExamsFinal ExamMultiple ChoiceCheat Sheet AllowedNo Math Involved

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, multiple-choice conceptual questions, cheat sheets, and no math, but difficulty varies widely.

Three ExamsFinal ExamMultiple ChoiceCheat Sheet AllowedNo Math Involved
“Graded only by 3 exams.”
ECON302
“The , the questions are all conceptual.”
ECON302
“He lets us bring a cheat sheet to the exams too.”
ECON302

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or webcam requirements.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall a class where you study to pass instead of studying to learn.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and grade risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🧑‍🏫 Teaching Quality

38/100

“ .”

🧪

92/100

“If you do bad on an assignments besides exams.”

📈 Grade Potential

58/100

“super easy A if you pay enough attention in class”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • professor decided .
  • .
  • This .

Theme 2

📝 About Exams

  • Graded only by 3 exams.
  • but they are nothing like the .
  • He lets us bring a cheat sheet to the exams too.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • super easy A if you pay enough attention in class
  • Class average on exams were 60-70%.
  • No math involved. no book needed

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Six recent reviews give detailed and , but opinions conflict sharply on difficulty and teaching quality.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ECON3025 reviews
ECON3041 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values