AI Rate Professor

Economics

Andre Jordan

ECON302 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable teaching yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderUnclear examsUnresponsiveHeavy papersInconsistent teaching
  • Two of three reviews strongly warn against taking the class because of , and harsh course structure.
  • Students report that quizzes and feel ineffective.
  • One older review is positive, but the more negative comments are sharper and more consequential.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Getting an A looks difficult because , and unreasonable deadlines.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The content may be interesting, but and difficult exams make the course feel challenging.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews , though one review says no Zoom classes were arranged during the COVID-19 crisis.

All evidence comes from in-person-labeled reviews, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Students mostly do not recommend him because of and exams, and frustrating grading expectations.

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, including two direct negative reviews and one older positive review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

and exams, and unclear pass or fail standing.

Format shift

, and the strongest evidence points to strict grading.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Workload concerns include many papers, difficult D2L deadlines, quizzes, class exercises, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

One review praises his examples, but the dominant concerns are unprofessional communication, uncaring behavior, and .

Format shift

but mostly negative teaching evidence.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Reviews mention papers, homework, quizzes, class exercises, and exams, so assessment appears mixed but .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, citing poor responsiveness, unclear exams, unreasonable deadlines, and .

Main concern

Students may not know what to study or whether they are passing.

What students said

“Material taught in class was not on quizzes and exams.”
ECON302
“Never really knew if we were passing or failing.”
ECON302

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear high-risk because students say tested material did not match class, but reviews do not clearly prove book policy or proctoring rules.

Unclear exam alignmentDifficult quizzes and examsExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams that did not match taught material, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Unclear exam alignmentDifficult quizzes and exams
“Material taught in class was not on quizzes and exams.”
ECON302
“Studying for them was useless.”
ECON302

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Material taught in class was not on quizzes and exams.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Never arranged any zoom class during Covid-19 crisis, never responded to emails.”

⚠️

25/100

“Studying for them was useless.”

👍 Recommendation Level

18/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Unprofessional and undisciplined professor.
  • Prof was sarcastic and uncaring.
  • The class is very interesting and Professor Jordan makes the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and unreasonable.
  • Never really knew if we were passing or failing.
  • but the quizzes and class exercises help a lot.

Theme 3

📝

  • Material taught in class was not on quizzes and exams.
  • Studying for them was useless.
  • Lecture heavy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

, but the negative comments are detailed and consistent enough to flag meaningful risk.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ECON3023 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values