AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Scot Lieser

CHEM305 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

unless you only care about an easy grade and can teach yourself the course material.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesEasy A but poor learningAlways behind scheduleUnprofessional behaviorTest heavy
  • All three reviews give the lowest teaching rating and strongly warn against taking him.
  • Students earned A grades, but they say the class taught very little and .
  • The main complaints are lateness, disorganization, skipped topics, rude behavior, and poor lab awareness.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

All reported grades are A and students describe few graded items, but the A comes with weak teaching and heavy self-teaching.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The course seems easy to pass but not easy to learn because , and incomplete.

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

78/100

, but comments say he still criticizes students publicly for lateness or absence.

reviews available.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Every because the teaching is disorganized, unprofessional, and ineffective.

All and is uniformly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

All listed grades are A and reviews describe few graded items, copied book questions, and .

Format shift

The grading leniency evidence is entirely from in-person CHEM305 reviews.

Workload

Light

76/100

There is and only a few exams or quizzes are mentioned, but .

Format shift

All workload evidence is in person.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students consistently describe unclear lectures, lateness, missed topics, disorganization, and unprofessional behavior.

Format shift

All and is consistently negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

, and few graded items, with .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews consistently describe a grade but poor for learning.

Main concern

Students report , and rude behavior despite receiving A grades.

What students said

“ .”
CHEM305
“ .”
CHEM305

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly mention midterms, a final, and book-based exam questions, but .

Two MidtermsFinal ExamBook Questions Copied For ExamsTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and exam questions copied from the book, but do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book rules.

Two MidtermsFinal ExamBook-Based Exam Questions
“He gives 2 midterms and a final.”
CHEM305
“the book questions were basically copied for exams.”
CHEM305

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I got an A, but I learnt way more chemistry in high school than his class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and professionalism. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Level

5/100

“ .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“Lectures circled and and he fell behind.”

📈 Easy Grade

82/100

“I got an A, but I learnt way more chemistry in high school than his class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Quality

  • Lectures circled and and he fell behind.
  • Always behind schedule.
  • He never knew what was going on in lab.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Workload

  • , but the book questions were basically copied for exams.
  • He gives 2 midterms and a final.
  • I got an A, but I learnt way more chemistry in high school than his class.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Professionalism

  • He couldn't manage to show up on time.
  • He sent rude and misspelled emails to his students.
  • The whole class was fed up with him at the end of the semester.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only three reviews, but they are highly consistent, detailed, and all from the same course period.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CHEM3053 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values