AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Domingo Soria Martin

MATH102 · MATH30 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you can handle mixed teaching quality and rely on practice work and office-hour help.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed teachingHelpful outside classMyMathLab requiredAttendance important
  • Student opinion is sharply split between poor teaching and helpful support.
  • , and MyMathLab practice.
  • One review strongly warns against him, so the recommendation level is low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

A good grade seems possible with , and MyMathLab practice, but it is not effortless.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The math content appears manageable with practice, though .

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

One tag says students will not pass if , and the positive review depends on attending class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is low because one student directly warns against him .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

and practice can lead to a good grade, but there is no strong evidence of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload centers on MyMathLab practice quizzes and tests, which can be manageable but tedious.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

46/100

Teaching quality is mixed, with one review criticizing his skills and another praising his help with questions.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Comments mention MyMathLab practice quizzes and everything.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

poor teacher and another saying he is helpful if students attend and practice.

Main concern

Teaching clarity is inconsistent, and one student found MyMathLab frustrating.

What students said

“Thick accent. Poor teaching skills. .”
MATH102
“ and he will answer any questions either in class or if you go to his office hours.”
MATH30

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention MyMathLab quizzes and tests but .

MyMathLab Practice QuizzesMyMathLab Tests

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests but do not clearly prove exam policy or proctoring.

MyMathLab Practice QuizzesMyMathLab Tests
“do all the and tests”
MATH30

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Thick accent. Poor teaching skills. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

46/100

“Thick accent. Poor teaching skills. .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

35/100

“ .”

📚 Effort To Grade

58/100

“If , and do all the and tests, you should have no problem getting a good grade in this class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Thick accent. Poor teaching skills.
  • and he will answer any questions either in class or if you go to his office hours.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If , and do all the and tests, you should have no problem getting a good grade in this class.
  • Makes you use MyMathLab which is horrible imo.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but they provide specific and contrasting evidence about teaching and workload.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1021 review
MATH301 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values