AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Rosemary Effiong

CHEM300 · CHEM14792 · CHEM400 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Consider Effiong only if you can work independently, use , and handle inconsistent communication.

Best fit · Effort For RewardMixed TeachingExtra CreditPoor CommunicationLab PressureFairly Easy Grader
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, with one strong lecture review and two negative experiences.
  • and , but communication and support are recurring concerns.
  • because one review says reports were due by the end of the session.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

and fairly easy grading help, but , and difficult tests.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Chemistry calculations, prelabs, detailed lectures, and .

, and they show mixed difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

A review uses the tag Skip class? You won't pass, and lab reports were required by the end of lab.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is weak because communication and helpfulness concerns outweigh one very positive lecture review.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

One review calls her a and another mentions , but test restrictions and workload limit the benefit.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students mention lots of , and lab reports due at the end of lab.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

One student praised detailed lectures, while others criticized weak communication and lack of help.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Reviews mention , and .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are split between detailed praise for lectures and and criticism of , and lab support.

Main concern

Students may struggle if .

What students said

“doesn't communicate with ”
CHEM400
“Her lectures are very detailed, and she gives ample opportunities.”
CHEM300
“Does not let students use Flashcards for Chem test”
CHEM14792

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews only clearly prove that flashcards were not allowed on a chemistry test, which made calculations harder for one student.

No FlashcardsChem TestCalculations

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, midterm, or final policies.

No FlashcardsChem TestCalculations
“Does not let students use Flashcards for when you have so many foumlas.”
CHEM14792

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she can be sweet and funny and is a . Cons: doesn't communicate with ”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“Her lectures are very detailed, and she gives ample opportunities.”

⚠️ Communication Issues

35/100

“doesn't communicate with ”

📈 Grade Support

62/100

“she can be sweet and funny and is a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are very detailed, and she gives ample opportunities.
  • doesn't communicate with

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Prelabs matter.
  • Does not let students use Flashcards for when you have so many foumlas.
  • she gives ample opportunities.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews , and the opinions are highly split across courses.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM147921 review
CHEM3001 review
CHEM4001 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1