AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Brandon Saller

ENGR011 · ENGR400 · ENGR412 · ENGR420 · ENGR10 · ENGR312 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
69.23%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want a strong engineering instructor and are willing to keep up with , and exams.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear lecturesCaringEngineering-focusedExam-preparedSome tough grading
  • Most students describe Saller as , and highly effective for engineering courses.
  • Grades are very achievable , and follow lecture examples.
  • A smaller group warns that and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

An A is realistic for , and follow lecture examples, but it is not a free grade.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Engineering content is real and sometimes hard, but and examples make it manageable.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance appears important because multiple reviews connect passing and .

online attendance evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend him because he teaches clearly, cares, and prepares students for exams.

The recommendation evidence is entirely in person because no online reviews exist.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grading appears fair but not soft, with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Students mention , and finals, but most describe the workload as manageable with effort.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Most comments describe him as , and one of the best engineering professors they had.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

Assessment uses homework-linked , and a final.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

for students, and exam alignment with homework and lecture examples.

Main concern

A , and required attendance.

What students said

“Saller is hands down one of the .”
ENGR400
“He gives detailed lectures, tells you exactly whats ”
ENGR420
“ . and no study guide.”
ENGR412

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally standard and homework-aligned, though some students still find them hard.

Homework-Based ExamsLecture-Based ExamsMidterm And FinalNo Curve Balls

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and and lecture examples, but some students find tests hard.

Homework-Based ExamsLecture-Based ExamsMidterm And Final
“most of and in class example”
ENGR420
“quizzes are worth 50%,midterms are 20%, finals are 20% and labs are 10%”
ENGR400
“ .”
ENGR420

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Saller is hands down one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“ , is relatable, and cares about his students.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“100% recommend, and the !”

⚖️

58/100

“ if you just need 0.1% for the next highest grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He gives detailed lectures, tells you exactly whats
  • The so far.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • If you go to his class, pay attention, and put in the work - you will learn.
  • and no study guide.
  • duplicates from HW.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Smart, caring and kind.
  • He really cares for his students.
  • Fresh, earnest young dude, eager to connect with students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen detailed in-person reviews across several years show a consistent positive pattern with a .

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENGR4125 reviews
ENGR4204 reviews
ENGR4003 reviews
ENGR3122 reviews
ENGR0111 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGR101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 1 · A 8

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1