AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Kim Codella

HUMM312 · HUM332 · HUM321 · HUM310 · HUM301 · HUMM126 · HUM328 · HUM300 · HUMANITIES · HUM324 · 110 lifetime ratings

AI rating
95/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
77.78%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

Codella is a strong choice if , and want an engaging humanities class with .

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing lecturesEasy A with notesStrict classroom rulesEssay basedPassionate teacher
  • Students overwhelmingly praise Codella as passionate, engaging, and memorable.
  • Grades are usually manageable if , and .
  • The main drawback is strict in-class behavior rules, especially phones, sleeping, lateness, and attention.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

An A is very attainable with , and basic essay effort, but students who dislike writing or .

Easy A evidence is overwhelmingly from in-person reviews; the single online review .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

Most students call the material easy and understandable because , though papers and fast lectures add some effort.

In-person comments repeatedly call the course easy, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

because exams, notes, quizzes, and classroom rules depend heavily on being present.

Attendance strictness is documented in in-person reviews; the .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Students recommend him because his lectures are unusually engaging and the class and follow expectations.

, while the single online review is also positive but limited.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

, and A grades when students follow lecture expectations.

Format shift

Lenient grading is supported mainly by in-person reviews; .

Workload

Moderate

68/100

, but , and note-heavy lectures can feel tedious.

Format shift

In-person workload is well documented, while the .

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students consistently describe him as passionate, inspiring, knowledgeable, and able to make humanities interesting.

Format shift

, and the online review also praises his passion and help.

Assessment method

Balanced

54/100

Grades combine , and finals rather than one single method.

Format shift

Assessment evidence is detailed for in-person sections; online assessment format is not clearly proven.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews strongly praise his lectures and and phone rules.

Main concern

, and follow strict classroom expectations.

What students said

“ .”
HUM300
“ HIS CLASS.”
HUM301

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review is positive and emphasizes passion, intelligence, and assignment support.

Main concern

Only one online review limits confidence about online structure and grading.

What students said

“Really intelligent and passionate about what he does.”
HUMM312

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and sometimes take-home, but reviews do not prove proctoring or book policies for every section.

Lecture-Based TestsTake-Home MidtermsSlide ID QuizzesShort Essay Finals

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as clear, lecture-based, and and essays appearing often.

Lecture-Based TestsTake-Home MidtermsSlide ID QuizzesShort Essay Finals
“ and .”
HUM300
“ and based off notes so attending is a good idea.”
HUM300

Online

The single online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“TAKE HIS CLASS! He makes class actually interesting, I've never taken a humanities class before and !”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom rules. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“His lectures were truly inspiring”

👍 Recommendation Rate

91/100

“ , class list for his courses fill fast!”

📈

80/100

“To get an A in this class, all you .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lecturer, the lectures are most of the in-class time and I've never looked at the clock while listening because they were just that interesting.
  • I was instantly sold from the first 15 minutes he lectured.
  • He makes the material understandable so someone who has no idea about humanities can come in and relate to it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • SUPER EASY! .
  • easy A and you will enjoy going to class.
  • The class seems very difficult at first, but after the as as it is.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Rules

  • No electronics are allowed in his class, just good old fashion pen and paper
  • Don't be late, use your phone, or sleep in his class.
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

110

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years show a very consistent pattern of , and strict attention rules.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 575
4 out of 525
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 52

Course coverage

HUM30018 reviews
HUM30115 reviews
HUM3326 reviews
HUM3242 reviews
3011 review
Show 8 more courses
3321 review
HUM 3011 review
HUM3101 review
HUM3211 review
HUM3281 review
HUMANITIES1 review
HUMM1261 review
HUMM3121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 5 · A 8

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 3 · Not_Sure_Yet 1