AI Rate Professor

English

Gloria Whited

ENGWR101 · ENGWR300 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
98/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.6

The decision

if you want a , and participation lead to strong results.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear FeedbackBeginner FriendlyAllows RewritesParticipation MattersEasy Pass
  • Students consistently praise her as , and .
  • The grade is very manageable because , and focuses .
  • Participation and reading matter, so students still need to show up prepared and engage in discussion.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

An A , and participation, though one review says it is not automatic.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

83/100

The course is described as easy and and revision chances.

Only in-person reviews describe course easiness.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

52/100

Reviews do not prove strict attendance, but participation, discussion, and .

; there is no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and helps students become better writers.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

, and clear essay expectations make passing and improving very achievable.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

, and discussion, with one review saying there are no tests and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Students describe her as , and .

Format shift

All and is consistently positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

, and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews show a highly supportive writing professor with , and manageable workload.

Main concern

Students need to keep up with reading and participate because she calls on students and .

What students said

“Allows rewrites so its almost impossible to fail.”
ENGWR101
“ .”
ENGWR101
“No tests and .”
ENGWR300

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because reviews emphasize essays and rewrites, with one review explicitly saying there are no tests.

No TestsEssaysRewritesPop Quiz Mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

90/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention no tests, essay-based grading, rewrites, and one pop quiz with a short essay response, but .

No TestsEssaysRewritesPop Quiz Mentioned
“No tests and .”
ENGWR300
“just 4 essays due throughout the semester and you can revise all of them.”
ENGWR300
“Make sure you read there's a .”
ENGWR300

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Allows rewrites so its almost impossible to fail.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and writing improvement. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“ .”

📈 Grade Support

86/100

“Allows rewrites so its almost impossible to fail.”

💬 Writing Growth

95/100

“Professor Whited class was good in that my writing improved.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She .
  • Always there to help students no matter what.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Work

  • Easy class! .
  • Not an Easy A, but if you do your work, you can pass.
  • Allows rewrites so its almost impossible to fail.

Theme 3

💬 About Participation

  • Participation count so read in advance, she calls on everyone
  • Class participation was required in this class when presenting projects.
  • I enjoyed group discussion the most on our subjects of reading.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

The 7 in-person reviews are detailed and consistent but limited in number and mostly from 2015 to 2018.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGWR1015 reviews
ENGWR3002 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values