AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Kate McEachen

HUM332 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
6/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you can tolerate off-topic lectures and learn the course material independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProOff-topic lecturesSo many papersLecture heavyNot recommended
  • Students report that class time was mostly spent on personal stories instead of humanities content.
  • The only review is strongly negative and says the professor should be avoided.
  • Workload appears paper-heavy, but grading and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

There is no grade evidence, and the significant written work.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The because the complaint is about off-topic teaching rather than hard material.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review does .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The only student directly .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Reviews do not provide clear grading evidence beyond a .

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The so .

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

The only review says the professor did not teach effectively and spent most class time off topic.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

The , while .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and not useful for learning humanities.

Main concern

Class time may not focus on course material.

What students said

“This teacher did not know how to teach a class!”
HUM332
“ .”
HUM332

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and recommendation. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“This teacher did not know how to teach a class!”

👍 Recommendation Level

5/100

“ .”

📝 Workload Signal

25/100

“Most of the time in this class we were only hearing about her life and her sex life and only learned about actual humanities for about 5 mins of the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This teacher did not know how to teach a class!
  • Most of the time in this class we were only hearing about her life and her sex life and only learned about actual humanities for about 5 mins of the class.

Theme 2

🚫 About Recommendation

  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so confidence is limited despite the strong negative tone.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HUM3321 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values